用线性关系分析改进WCET评价

Pascal Raymond, Claire Maiza, C. Parent-Vigouroux, Erwan Jahier, N. Halbwachs, Fabienne Carrier, Mihail Asavoae, Rémy Boutonnet
{"title":"用线性关系分析改进WCET评价","authors":"Pascal Raymond, Claire Maiza, C. Parent-Vigouroux, Erwan Jahier, N. Halbwachs, Fabienne Carrier, Mihail Asavoae, Rémy Boutonnet","doi":"10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The precision of a worst case execution time (WCET) evaluation tool on a given program is highly dependent on how the tool is able to detect and discard semantically infeasible executions of the program. In this paper, we propose to use the classical abstract interpretation-based method of linear relation analysis to discover and exploit relations between execution paths. For this purpose, we add auxiliary variables (counters) to the program to trace its execution paths. The results are easily incorporated in the classical workflow of a WCET evaluator, when the evaluator is based on the popular implicit path enumeration technique. We use existing tools - a WCET evaluator and a linear relation analyzer - to build and experiment a prototype implementation of this idea.","PeriodicalId":376325,"journal":{"name":"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving WCET Evaluation using Linear Relation Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Raymond, Claire Maiza, C. Parent-Vigouroux, Erwan Jahier, N. Halbwachs, Fabienne Carrier, Mihail Asavoae, Rémy Boutonnet\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The precision of a worst case execution time (WCET) evaluation tool on a given program is highly dependent on how the tool is able to detect and discard semantically infeasible executions of the program. In this paper, we propose to use the classical abstract interpretation-based method of linear relation analysis to discover and exploit relations between execution paths. For this purpose, we add auxiliary variables (counters) to the program to trace its execution paths. The results are easily incorporated in the classical workflow of a WCET evaluator, when the evaluator is based on the popular implicit path enumeration technique. We use existing tools - a WCET evaluator and a linear relation analyzer - to build and experiment a prototype implementation of this idea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leibniz Trans. Embed. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

给定程序的最坏情况执行时间(WCET)评估工具的精度高度依赖于该工具如何能够检测和丢弃语义上不可行的程序执行。在本文中,我们建议使用经典的基于抽象解释的线性关系分析方法来发现和利用执行路径之间的关系。为此,我们向程序添加辅助变量(计数器)以跟踪其执行路径。当评估器基于流行的隐式路径枚举技术时,结果很容易融入到WCET评估器的经典工作流中。我们使用现有的工具——一个WCET评估器和一个线性关系分析器——来构建和实验这个想法的原型实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving WCET Evaluation using Linear Relation Analysis
The precision of a worst case execution time (WCET) evaluation tool on a given program is highly dependent on how the tool is able to detect and discard semantically infeasible executions of the program. In this paper, we propose to use the classical abstract interpretation-based method of linear relation analysis to discover and exploit relations between execution paths. For this purpose, we add auxiliary variables (counters) to the program to trace its execution paths. The results are easily incorporated in the classical workflow of a WCET evaluator, when the evaluator is based on the popular implicit path enumeration technique. We use existing tools - a WCET evaluator and a linear relation analyzer - to build and experiment a prototype implementation of this idea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信