数字场景中的公民参与:它是否由法官控制?

Andrea Célemin
{"title":"数字场景中的公民参与:它是否由法官控制?","authors":"Andrea Célemin","doi":"10.21789/25007807.1339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes interventions of judges about digital citizenship in Latin \nAmerica. The objectives of this work are: (i) to do a review of the literature in \nrelation to political participation in digital scenarios and (ii) to analyze the \nmechanisms of control that, specifically, judges have begun to impose on the \nexercise of the digital citizenship. To develop the proposed objectives, it has been \nselected a judicial decision in a non-separation powers context, which have been \nanalyzed using the methodology of case study. In the examined decision, a citizen \nused social networks to make political opposition. Different hashtags, photos or \nmessages, sent by social networks, were used as evidences called in a judicial decision \nfor imposing legal sanctions. The article initiates a reflection on this type of controls \non the usage of social networking as a mechanism of political opposition. From \nthese forms of control, the state power determines the \"correct\" ways in which \ncitizens or political parties can perform the digital citizenship.","PeriodicalId":297182,"journal":{"name":"Razón Crítica","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participación ciudadana en escenarios digitales: ¿Es controlada por los jueces?\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Célemin\",\"doi\":\"10.21789/25007807.1339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes interventions of judges about digital citizenship in Latin \\nAmerica. The objectives of this work are: (i) to do a review of the literature in \\nrelation to political participation in digital scenarios and (ii) to analyze the \\nmechanisms of control that, specifically, judges have begun to impose on the \\nexercise of the digital citizenship. To develop the proposed objectives, it has been \\nselected a judicial decision in a non-separation powers context, which have been \\nanalyzed using the methodology of case study. In the examined decision, a citizen \\nused social networks to make political opposition. Different hashtags, photos or \\nmessages, sent by social networks, were used as evidences called in a judicial decision \\nfor imposing legal sanctions. The article initiates a reflection on this type of controls \\non the usage of social networking as a mechanism of political opposition. From \\nthese forms of control, the state power determines the \\\"correct\\\" ways in which \\ncitizens or political parties can perform the digital citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Razón Crítica\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Razón Crítica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Razón Crítica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析拉丁美洲法官对数字公民的干预。这项工作的目标是:(i)对数字场景中政治参与的相关文献进行回顾;(ii)分析法官开始对数字公民行使施加的控制机制。为了发展拟议的目标,在非权力分立的情况下选择了一项司法决定,并使用个案研究的方法对其进行了分析。在被审查的判决中,一名公民利用社交网络进行政治反对。社交网络上发送的不同标签、照片或信息被用作司法裁决中施加法律制裁的证据。这篇文章开始反思这种对社交网络使用的控制作为一种政治反对机制。从这些控制形式中,国家权力决定公民或政党履行数字公民身份的“正确”方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participación ciudadana en escenarios digitales: ¿Es controlada por los jueces?
This article analyzes interventions of judges about digital citizenship in Latin America. The objectives of this work are: (i) to do a review of the literature in relation to political participation in digital scenarios and (ii) to analyze the mechanisms of control that, specifically, judges have begun to impose on the exercise of the digital citizenship. To develop the proposed objectives, it has been selected a judicial decision in a non-separation powers context, which have been analyzed using the methodology of case study. In the examined decision, a citizen used social networks to make political opposition. Different hashtags, photos or messages, sent by social networks, were used as evidences called in a judicial decision for imposing legal sanctions. The article initiates a reflection on this type of controls on the usage of social networking as a mechanism of political opposition. From these forms of control, the state power determines the "correct" ways in which citizens or political parties can perform the digital citizenship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信