{"title":"数字场景中的公民参与:它是否由法官控制?","authors":"Andrea Célemin","doi":"10.21789/25007807.1339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes interventions of judges about digital citizenship in Latin \nAmerica. The objectives of this work are: (i) to do a review of the literature in \nrelation to political participation in digital scenarios and (ii) to analyze the \nmechanisms of control that, specifically, judges have begun to impose on the \nexercise of the digital citizenship. To develop the proposed objectives, it has been \nselected a judicial decision in a non-separation powers context, which have been \nanalyzed using the methodology of case study. In the examined decision, a citizen \nused social networks to make political opposition. Different hashtags, photos or \nmessages, sent by social networks, were used as evidences called in a judicial decision \nfor imposing legal sanctions. The article initiates a reflection on this type of controls \non the usage of social networking as a mechanism of political opposition. From \nthese forms of control, the state power determines the \"correct\" ways in which \ncitizens or political parties can perform the digital citizenship.","PeriodicalId":297182,"journal":{"name":"Razón Crítica","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participación ciudadana en escenarios digitales: ¿Es controlada por los jueces?\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Célemin\",\"doi\":\"10.21789/25007807.1339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes interventions of judges about digital citizenship in Latin \\nAmerica. The objectives of this work are: (i) to do a review of the literature in \\nrelation to political participation in digital scenarios and (ii) to analyze the \\nmechanisms of control that, specifically, judges have begun to impose on the \\nexercise of the digital citizenship. To develop the proposed objectives, it has been \\nselected a judicial decision in a non-separation powers context, which have been \\nanalyzed using the methodology of case study. In the examined decision, a citizen \\nused social networks to make political opposition. Different hashtags, photos or \\nmessages, sent by social networks, were used as evidences called in a judicial decision \\nfor imposing legal sanctions. The article initiates a reflection on this type of controls \\non the usage of social networking as a mechanism of political opposition. From \\nthese forms of control, the state power determines the \\\"correct\\\" ways in which \\ncitizens or political parties can perform the digital citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Razón Crítica\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Razón Crítica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Razón Crítica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21789/25007807.1339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Participación ciudadana en escenarios digitales: ¿Es controlada por los jueces?
This article analyzes interventions of judges about digital citizenship in Latin
America. The objectives of this work are: (i) to do a review of the literature in
relation to political participation in digital scenarios and (ii) to analyze the
mechanisms of control that, specifically, judges have begun to impose on the
exercise of the digital citizenship. To develop the proposed objectives, it has been
selected a judicial decision in a non-separation powers context, which have been
analyzed using the methodology of case study. In the examined decision, a citizen
used social networks to make political opposition. Different hashtags, photos or
messages, sent by social networks, were used as evidences called in a judicial decision
for imposing legal sanctions. The article initiates a reflection on this type of controls
on the usage of social networking as a mechanism of political opposition. From
these forms of control, the state power determines the "correct" ways in which
citizens or political parties can perform the digital citizenship.