物联网中数据采集方法的比较分析

Sofia, Isha Batra, V. Verma, A. Malik
{"title":"物联网中数据采集方法的比较分析","authors":"Sofia, Isha Batra, V. Verma, A. Malik","doi":"10.1145/3339311.3339354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increase in demand of Internet of Things using smart devices, different architectures are available for collecting the data in IoT platforms. Data collection phase is one of the most critical phase in the whole process of communication between device and human. Numerous data collection solutions were proposed in the literature. But still these existing solutions are lacking rationale and can be further improvised. Therefore, this paper conducts a detailed review on the existing methods for data collection. Later, a comparison is made among the existing concurrent tree method, low-density parity check code method and context awareness routing method in terms of their research objectives, techniques, input and output. Finally this paper evaluates the energy consumption, latency and storage requirements for different data collection methods. Results show that concurrent data collection tree method provides maximum storage, consumes more energy and possess less latency.","PeriodicalId":206653,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advanced Informatics for Computing Research - ICAICR '19","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of data collection methods in internet of things\",\"authors\":\"Sofia, Isha Batra, V. Verma, A. Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3339311.3339354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increase in demand of Internet of Things using smart devices, different architectures are available for collecting the data in IoT platforms. Data collection phase is one of the most critical phase in the whole process of communication between device and human. Numerous data collection solutions were proposed in the literature. But still these existing solutions are lacking rationale and can be further improvised. Therefore, this paper conducts a detailed review on the existing methods for data collection. Later, a comparison is made among the existing concurrent tree method, low-density parity check code method and context awareness routing method in terms of their research objectives, techniques, input and output. Finally this paper evaluates the energy consumption, latency and storage requirements for different data collection methods. Results show that concurrent data collection tree method provides maximum storage, consumes more energy and possess less latency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advanced Informatics for Computing Research - ICAICR '19\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advanced Informatics for Computing Research - ICAICR '19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3339311.3339354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advanced Informatics for Computing Research - ICAICR '19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3339311.3339354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着智能设备对物联网需求的增加,物联网平台上的数据采集有了不同的架构。数据采集阶段是设备与人沟通的整个过程中最关键的阶段之一。文献中提出了许多数据收集解决方案。但这些现有的解决方案仍然缺乏合理性,还可以进一步即兴发挥。因此,本文对现有的数据收集方法进行了详细的回顾。然后,对现有的并发树方法、低密度奇偶校验码方法和上下文感知路由方法的研究目标、技术、输入和输出进行了比较。最后对不同数据采集方式的能耗、时延和存储要求进行了评估。结果表明,并行数据收集树方法提供了最大的存储空间,消耗了更多的能量,并且具有较小的延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of data collection methods in internet of things
With the increase in demand of Internet of Things using smart devices, different architectures are available for collecting the data in IoT platforms. Data collection phase is one of the most critical phase in the whole process of communication between device and human. Numerous data collection solutions were proposed in the literature. But still these existing solutions are lacking rationale and can be further improvised. Therefore, this paper conducts a detailed review on the existing methods for data collection. Later, a comparison is made among the existing concurrent tree method, low-density parity check code method and context awareness routing method in terms of their research objectives, techniques, input and output. Finally this paper evaluates the energy consumption, latency and storage requirements for different data collection methods. Results show that concurrent data collection tree method provides maximum storage, consumes more energy and possess less latency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信