{"title":"GATE对所有学生都有好处","authors":"H. Bhargava","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2230218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates the comparative performance of several elementary school districts in Northern California which implement either a self-contained GATE (gifted and talented education) program or an alternative mixed-classroom model. The results demonstrate that the self-contained GATE model, by reducing within-classroom disparities in both GATE and non-GATE classes, leads to better academic progress for both GATE and non-GATE children, than the mixed classroom model.","PeriodicalId":383397,"journal":{"name":"Innovation Educator: Courses","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GATE is Good for All Students\",\"authors\":\"H. Bhargava\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2230218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper evaluates the comparative performance of several elementary school districts in Northern California which implement either a self-contained GATE (gifted and talented education) program or an alternative mixed-classroom model. The results demonstrate that the self-contained GATE model, by reducing within-classroom disparities in both GATE and non-GATE classes, leads to better academic progress for both GATE and non-GATE children, than the mixed classroom model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation Educator: Courses\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation Educator: Courses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2230218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2230218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper evaluates the comparative performance of several elementary school districts in Northern California which implement either a self-contained GATE (gifted and talented education) program or an alternative mixed-classroom model. The results demonstrate that the self-contained GATE model, by reducing within-classroom disparities in both GATE and non-GATE classes, leads to better academic progress for both GATE and non-GATE children, than the mixed classroom model.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
