DMCA中安全港原则与平台责任分配探讨

Peixuan Wang
{"title":"DMCA中安全港原则与平台责任分配探讨","authors":"Peixuan Wang","doi":"10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Digital Millennium Copyright Act's safe harbor clauses, which was established more than 20 years ago, are no longer able to reconcile the current widespread problem of copyright infringement in social media. Therefore, this paper examines the allocation of responsibilities between social media platforms, users and copyright owners in the event of digital copyright infringement in social media, the negative impact of the DMCA provisions on stakeholders in social media and possible solutions to the problem. The main problem with the current DMCA's safe harbor doctrine is that the exemptions provided shift too much responsibility and liability to copyright owners and social media users, fail to provide effective remedies, and place an extremely heavy burden on them to enforce their rights. This has had a negative impact on the development of social media and creative output. For this reason, Congress need to change the DMCA's upregulating to increase the bar for safe harbor designation and impose additional requirements on platforms. In order to more effectively contribute to the growth of the social media business and the preservation of digital copyright pairs in the field of practice, this study primarily adopts a legal doctrinal research technique, comparative research approach, and literary research method.","PeriodicalId":380947,"journal":{"name":"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Safe Harbor Principle and the Allocation of Platform Liability in the DMCA\",\"authors\":\"Peixuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Digital Millennium Copyright Act's safe harbor clauses, which was established more than 20 years ago, are no longer able to reconcile the current widespread problem of copyright infringement in social media. Therefore, this paper examines the allocation of responsibilities between social media platforms, users and copyright owners in the event of digital copyright infringement in social media, the negative impact of the DMCA provisions on stakeholders in social media and possible solutions to the problem. The main problem with the current DMCA's safe harbor doctrine is that the exemptions provided shift too much responsibility and liability to copyright owners and social media users, fail to provide effective remedies, and place an extremely heavy burden on them to enforce their rights. This has had a negative impact on the development of social media and creative output. For this reason, Congress need to change the DMCA's upregulating to increase the bar for safe harbor designation and impose additional requirements on platforms. In order to more effectively contribute to the growth of the social media business and the preservation of digital copyright pairs in the field of practice, this study primarily adopts a legal doctrinal research technique, comparative research approach, and literary research method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20多年前制定的《数字千年版权法案》(Digital Millennium Copyright Act)的安全港条款,已经无法解决当前社交媒体中普遍存在的版权侵权问题。因此,本文将探讨社交媒体发生数字版权侵权事件时,社交媒体平台、用户和版权所有者之间的责任分配、DMCA条款对社交媒体利益相关者的负面影响以及可能的解决方案。当前DMCA的安全港原则的主要问题是,提供的豁免将过多的责任和义务转移给版权所有者和社交媒体用户,未能提供有效的补救措施,并给他们施加了极其沉重的负担来行使他们的权利。这对社交媒体和创意产出的发展产生了负面影响。出于这个原因,国会需要改变DMCA的上调规定,增加安全港指定的门槛,并对平台施加额外的要求。为了在实践领域更有效地促进社交媒体业务的发展和数字版权对的保护,本研究主要采用法律理论研究方法、比较研究方法和文献研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Safe Harbor Principle and the Allocation of Platform Liability in the DMCA
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act's safe harbor clauses, which was established more than 20 years ago, are no longer able to reconcile the current widespread problem of copyright infringement in social media. Therefore, this paper examines the allocation of responsibilities between social media platforms, users and copyright owners in the event of digital copyright infringement in social media, the negative impact of the DMCA provisions on stakeholders in social media and possible solutions to the problem. The main problem with the current DMCA's safe harbor doctrine is that the exemptions provided shift too much responsibility and liability to copyright owners and social media users, fail to provide effective remedies, and place an extremely heavy burden on them to enforce their rights. This has had a negative impact on the development of social media and creative output. For this reason, Congress need to change the DMCA's upregulating to increase the bar for safe harbor designation and impose additional requirements on platforms. In order to more effectively contribute to the growth of the social media business and the preservation of digital copyright pairs in the field of practice, this study primarily adopts a legal doctrinal research technique, comparative research approach, and literary research method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信