{"title":"Popławski II:半心半意地拥抱等级至上","authors":"S. Haket","doi":"10.7590/187479820x15881424928435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Popławski II judgment, it is held that primacy of EU law provides the legal basis for the duty of consistent interpretation and State liability. This corresponds to a perspective where there is a hierarchical relationship between EU and national law. However, another feature\n of this hierarchical model, i.e. the possibility to disapply conflicting national law, without having recourse to direct effect, is rejected.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Popławski II: A Half-Hearted Embrace of Hierarchical Supremacy\",\"authors\":\"S. Haket\",\"doi\":\"10.7590/187479820x15881424928435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Popławski II judgment, it is held that primacy of EU law provides the legal basis for the duty of consistent interpretation and State liability. This corresponds to a perspective where there is a hierarchical relationship between EU and national law. However, another feature\\n of this hierarchical model, i.e. the possibility to disapply conflicting national law, without having recourse to direct effect, is rejected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Administrative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x15881424928435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479820x15881424928435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Popławski II: A Half-Hearted Embrace of Hierarchical Supremacy
In the Popławski II judgment, it is held that primacy of EU law provides the legal basis for the duty of consistent interpretation and State liability. This corresponds to a perspective where there is a hierarchical relationship between EU and national law. However, another feature
of this hierarchical model, i.e. the possibility to disapply conflicting national law, without having recourse to direct effect, is rejected.