AeroMACS频段的兼容性研究

2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings Pub Date : 2011-05-10 DOI:10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935358

J. Håkegård

{"title":"AeroMACS频段的兼容性研究","authors":"J. Håkegård","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contains results from compatibility studies between AeroMACS and other systems operating in the same or adjacent frequency bands. These systems are RLAN, AMT, MLS and FSS feeder links. For compatibility with the terrestrial systems, the minimum distance to interferer is calculated, i.e. the minimum distance an interfering transmitter can be from a victim receiver without degrading the system performance beyond a permitted limit. For compatibility with FSS feeder links, the number of AeroMACS systems that may be installed in Europe without causing harmful interference to non-GEO satellite feeder link receivers is calculated. The results presented in this paper indicate that both MLS and AMT may cause harmful interference to AeroMACS if no precautions are made, while this is unlikely to happen when it comes to RLANs. Concerning compatibility with FSS feeder links, more than about 400 airports in Europe must be equipped with large AeroMACS installations to potentially cause harmful interference to FSS systems.","PeriodicalId":263977,"journal":{"name":"2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compatibility study in the AeroMACS frequency band\",\"authors\":\"J. Håkegård\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper contains results from compatibility studies between AeroMACS and other systems operating in the same or adjacent frequency bands. These systems are RLAN, AMT, MLS and FSS feeder links. For compatibility with the terrestrial systems, the minimum distance to interferer is calculated, i.e. the minimum distance an interfering transmitter can be from a victim receiver without degrading the system performance beyond a permitted limit. For compatibility with FSS feeder links, the number of AeroMACS systems that may be installed in Europe without causing harmful interference to non-GEO satellite feeder link receivers is calculated. The results presented in this paper indicate that both MLS and AMT may cause harmful interference to AeroMACS if no precautions are made, while this is unlikely to happen when it comes to RLANs. Concerning compatibility with FSS feeder links, more than about 400 airports in Europe must be equipped with large AeroMACS installations to potentially cause harmful interference to FSS systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2011.5935358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

本文包含了AeroMACS和其他系统在相同或相邻频带上的兼容性研究结果。这些系统是RLAN, AMT, MLS和FSS馈线链路。为了与地面系统兼容，计算到干扰的最小距离，即干扰发射机与受干扰接收机之间的最小距离，而不会使系统性能下降到超过允许的限度。为了与FSS馈线链路的兼容性，可以在欧洲安装的AeroMACS系统的数量不会对非geo卫星馈线链路接收器造成有害干扰。本文结果表明，如果不采取预防措施，MLS和AMT都可能对AeroMACS造成有害干扰，而对于rlan则不太可能发生这种情况。关于与FSS支线链路的兼容性，欧洲约有400多个机场必须配备大型AeroMACS装置，以可能对FSS系统造成有害干扰。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Compatibility study in the AeroMACS frequency band

This paper contains results from compatibility studies between AeroMACS and other systems operating in the same or adjacent frequency bands. These systems are RLAN, AMT, MLS and FSS feeder links. For compatibility with the terrestrial systems, the minimum distance to interferer is calculated, i.e. the minimum distance an interfering transmitter can be from a victim receiver without degrading the system performance beyond a permitted limit. For compatibility with FSS feeder links, the number of AeroMACS systems that may be installed in Europe without causing harmful interference to non-GEO satellite feeder link receivers is calculated. The results presented in this paper indicate that both MLS and AMT may cause harmful interference to AeroMACS if no precautions are made, while this is unlikely to happen when it comes to RLANs. Concerning compatibility with FSS feeder links, more than about 400 airports in Europe must be equipped with large AeroMACS installations to potentially cause harmful interference to FSS systems.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings

自引率

0.00%

发文量