{"title":"普适计算两种编程模型的比较","authors":"Hen-I Yang, Erwin Jansen, A. Helal","doi":"10.1109/SAINT-W.2006.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Establishing suitable programming models for pervasive spaces is essential in improving the productivity, enhancing the quality of pervasive systems, and creating an open platform for interoperability. Two different models, namely, the context-driven model and the service-oriented model, have been proposed and studied for their feasibilities as the foundation for implementing programmable pervasive spaces. We present these two alternatives and contrast their advantages and disadvantages.","PeriodicalId":297153,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINTW'06)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two programming models for pervasive computing\",\"authors\":\"Hen-I Yang, Erwin Jansen, A. Helal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SAINT-W.2006.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Establishing suitable programming models for pervasive spaces is essential in improving the productivity, enhancing the quality of pervasive systems, and creating an open platform for interoperability. Two different models, namely, the context-driven model and the service-oriented model, have been proposed and studied for their feasibilities as the foundation for implementing programmable pervasive spaces. We present these two alternatives and contrast their advantages and disadvantages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINTW'06)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINTW'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAINT-W.2006.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINTW'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAINT-W.2006.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison of two programming models for pervasive computing
Establishing suitable programming models for pervasive spaces is essential in improving the productivity, enhancing the quality of pervasive systems, and creating an open platform for interoperability. Two different models, namely, the context-driven model and the service-oriented model, have been proposed and studied for their feasibilities as the foundation for implementing programmable pervasive spaces. We present these two alternatives and contrast their advantages and disadvantages.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
