只需点击一下即可

Aurélien Portuese
{"title":"只需点击一下即可","authors":"Aurélien Portuese","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3003953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a US Senate Hearing in 2011, Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, stated that ‘competition is only one click away’. On the 27th of June 2017, the European Commission fined Google €2.42 billion for allegedly ‘abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service’. Ruthlessly, fine is only one click away too. \nWhat does the European Commission criticise for imposing such a break-record fine to Google? According to Competition Commission Margareth Vestager, ‘Google abused its market dominance as a search engine by promoting its own comparison shopping service in its search results, and demoting those of competitors’ (...) therefore denying ‘other companies the chance to compete on the merits and to innovate. And most importantly, it denied European consumers a genuine choice of services and the full benefits of innovation’. \nThe products referenced on Google Shopping, the shopping platform of Google Inc., have been promoted in the search results in comparison with other shopping platforms, the Commission considered. \nThe legal arguments of the European Commission are clear: thanks to its complex algorithms, Google has allegedly manipulated the search results of products in order to promote its own platform, Google Shopping, at the expense of competitors. Because the position on the search results is tantamount to a price paid by competitors in order to attract consumers, by manipulating its search results, Google has abused its dominance and therefore infringed Article 102 TFEU because it i) ‘has systematically given prominent placement to its own comparison shopping service’ and ii) ‘has demoted rival comparison shopping services in its search results’. \nAlbeit clear, both legal arguments of the European Commission are nonetheless unsubstantiated and ungrounded as discussed below successively.","PeriodicalId":333064,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Topic)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fine is Only One Click Away\",\"authors\":\"Aurélien Portuese\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3003953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a US Senate Hearing in 2011, Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, stated that ‘competition is only one click away’. On the 27th of June 2017, the European Commission fined Google €2.42 billion for allegedly ‘abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service’. Ruthlessly, fine is only one click away too. \\nWhat does the European Commission criticise for imposing such a break-record fine to Google? According to Competition Commission Margareth Vestager, ‘Google abused its market dominance as a search engine by promoting its own comparison shopping service in its search results, and demoting those of competitors’ (...) therefore denying ‘other companies the chance to compete on the merits and to innovate. And most importantly, it denied European consumers a genuine choice of services and the full benefits of innovation’. \\nThe products referenced on Google Shopping, the shopping platform of Google Inc., have been promoted in the search results in comparison with other shopping platforms, the Commission considered. \\nThe legal arguments of the European Commission are clear: thanks to its complex algorithms, Google has allegedly manipulated the search results of products in order to promote its own platform, Google Shopping, at the expense of competitors. Because the position on the search results is tantamount to a price paid by competitors in order to attract consumers, by manipulating its search results, Google has abused its dominance and therefore infringed Article 102 TFEU because it i) ‘has systematically given prominent placement to its own comparison shopping service’ and ii) ‘has demoted rival comparison shopping services in its search results’. \\nAlbeit clear, both legal arguments of the European Commission are nonetheless unsubstantiated and ungrounded as discussed below successively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3003953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3003953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在2011年的美国参议院听证会上,谷歌首席执行官埃里克·施密特(Eric Schmidt)表示,“只要点击一下鼠标,竞争就会到来”。2017年6月27日,欧盟委员会对谷歌处以24.2亿欧元的罚款,理由是谷歌涉嫌“滥用搜索引擎的主导地位,为自己的比较购物服务提供非法优势”。无情的是,fine也只需要点击一下。欧盟委员会(European Commission)对谷歌处以如此破纪录的罚款,批评的是什么?美国竞争委员会(Competition Commission)的韦斯塔格尔(Margareth Vestager)说,谷歌滥用其作为搜索引擎的市场主导地位,在搜索结果中推广自己的比价购物服务,并贬低竞争对手的服务……因此剥夺了其他公司凭实力竞争和创新的机会。最重要的是,它剥夺了欧洲消费者对服务的真正选择和创新的全部好处。”委员会认为,与其他购物平台相比,在谷歌公司的购物平台Google Shopping上引用的产品在搜索结果中得到了推广。欧盟委员会的法律论据很明确:由于其复杂的算法,谷歌据称操纵了产品的搜索结果,以推广自己的平台谷歌购物(Google Shopping),损害了竞争对手的利益。由于在搜索结果中的位置相当于竞争对手为了吸引消费者而付出的代价,通过操纵其搜索结果,谷歌滥用了其主导地位,因此违反了《竞争法》第102条,因为它i)“系统地将自己的比较购物服务放在突出位置”,ii)“在其搜索结果中贬低了竞争对手的比较购物服务”。尽管很清楚,但欧盟委员会的两种法律论点都是没有根据的,下文将陆续讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fine is Only One Click Away
In a US Senate Hearing in 2011, Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, stated that ‘competition is only one click away’. On the 27th of June 2017, the European Commission fined Google €2.42 billion for allegedly ‘abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service’. Ruthlessly, fine is only one click away too. What does the European Commission criticise for imposing such a break-record fine to Google? According to Competition Commission Margareth Vestager, ‘Google abused its market dominance as a search engine by promoting its own comparison shopping service in its search results, and demoting those of competitors’ (...) therefore denying ‘other companies the chance to compete on the merits and to innovate. And most importantly, it denied European consumers a genuine choice of services and the full benefits of innovation’. The products referenced on Google Shopping, the shopping platform of Google Inc., have been promoted in the search results in comparison with other shopping platforms, the Commission considered. The legal arguments of the European Commission are clear: thanks to its complex algorithms, Google has allegedly manipulated the search results of products in order to promote its own platform, Google Shopping, at the expense of competitors. Because the position on the search results is tantamount to a price paid by competitors in order to attract consumers, by manipulating its search results, Google has abused its dominance and therefore infringed Article 102 TFEU because it i) ‘has systematically given prominent placement to its own comparison shopping service’ and ii) ‘has demoted rival comparison shopping services in its search results’. Albeit clear, both legal arguments of the European Commission are nonetheless unsubstantiated and ungrounded as discussed below successively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信