一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,对比钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和安慰剂在1型糖尿病患者中的安全性

S. Saha, Sujata Saha
{"title":"一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,对比钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和安慰剂在1型糖尿病患者中的安全性","authors":"S. Saha, Sujata Saha","doi":"10.1159/000506366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aims to contrast the side effects of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and placebo in insulin-treated adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Methods: Double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compare the above outcome were searched in electronic databases. Next, the risk of bias in eligible studies was assessed, and comparable outcomes were compared by a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Seven eligible papers comprising about 3,900 participants were studied. All trials suffered from an unclear risk of detection bias and performance bias. In comparison with the placebo group, the risk of genital infection (RR = 3.22, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.31–4.49, I2 = 0%) and diabetic ketoacidosis (RR = 2.66, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.45–4.89, I2 = 0%) was higher in the SGLT2i-treated group. Conclusion: SGLT2i treatment increased the risk of genital infection and diabetic ketoacidosis in adult insulin-treated T1DM patients.","PeriodicalId":405374,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials, Contrasting the Safety Profile between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Placebo in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients\",\"authors\":\"S. Saha, Sujata Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000506366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study aims to contrast the side effects of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and placebo in insulin-treated adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Methods: Double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compare the above outcome were searched in electronic databases. Next, the risk of bias in eligible studies was assessed, and comparable outcomes were compared by a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Seven eligible papers comprising about 3,900 participants were studied. All trials suffered from an unclear risk of detection bias and performance bias. In comparison with the placebo group, the risk of genital infection (RR = 3.22, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.31–4.49, I2 = 0%) and diabetic ketoacidosis (RR = 2.66, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.45–4.89, I2 = 0%) was higher in the SGLT2i-treated group. Conclusion: SGLT2i treatment increased the risk of genital infection and diabetic ketoacidosis in adult insulin-treated T1DM patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000506366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000506366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:本研究旨在比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和安慰剂治疗胰岛素治疗的成人1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的副作用。方法:在电子数据库中检索比较上述结果的双盲随机对照试验。接下来,评估符合条件的研究的偏倚风险,并通过随机效应荟萃分析比较可比结果。结果:研究了7篇符合条件的论文,约3900名参与者。所有的试验都存在不明确的检测偏倚和表现偏倚风险。与安慰剂组相比,sgltti治疗组生殖器感染(RR = 3.22, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.31-4.49, I2 = 0%)和糖尿病酮症酸中毒(RR = 2.66, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.45-4.89, I2 = 0%)的风险更高。结论:SGLT2i治疗增加了胰岛素治疗的成年T1DM患者生殖器感染和糖尿病酮症酸中毒的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials, Contrasting the Safety Profile between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Placebo in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
Background: This study aims to contrast the side effects of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and placebo in insulin-treated adult type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Methods: Double-blinded randomized controlled trials that compare the above outcome were searched in electronic databases. Next, the risk of bias in eligible studies was assessed, and comparable outcomes were compared by a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Seven eligible papers comprising about 3,900 participants were studied. All trials suffered from an unclear risk of detection bias and performance bias. In comparison with the placebo group, the risk of genital infection (RR = 3.22, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.31–4.49, I2 = 0%) and diabetic ketoacidosis (RR = 2.66, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.45–4.89, I2 = 0%) was higher in the SGLT2i-treated group. Conclusion: SGLT2i treatment increased the risk of genital infection and diabetic ketoacidosis in adult insulin-treated T1DM patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信