快速进化规划中的局部搜索算子

H. K. Birru, K. Chellapilla, S. Rao
{"title":"快速进化规划中的局部搜索算子","authors":"H. K. Birru, K. Chellapilla, S. Rao","doi":"10.1109/CEC.1999.782662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have shown that embedding local search in classical evolutionary programming (EP) could lead to improved performance on function optimization problems. The utility of local search is investigated with fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and comparisons are offered between performance improvements obtained when using local search with Gaussian and Cauchy mutations. Experiments were conducted on a suite of four well known function optimization problems using two local search methods (conjugate gradient and F.J. Solis and R.J.-B. Wets, (1981)) with varying amounts of local search being incorporated into the evolutionary algorithm. Empirical results indicate that FEP with the conjugate gradient method outperforms other hybrid methods on three of the four functions when evolution was conducted for a fixed number of generations. Trials using local search produced solutions that were statistically as good as or better than trials without local search. However, the cost of using local search justified the enhancement in solution quality only when using Gaussian mutations but not when using Cauchy mutations.","PeriodicalId":292523,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local search operators in fast evolutionary programming\",\"authors\":\"H. K. Birru, K. Chellapilla, S. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.1999.782662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous studies have shown that embedding local search in classical evolutionary programming (EP) could lead to improved performance on function optimization problems. The utility of local search is investigated with fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and comparisons are offered between performance improvements obtained when using local search with Gaussian and Cauchy mutations. Experiments were conducted on a suite of four well known function optimization problems using two local search methods (conjugate gradient and F.J. Solis and R.J.-B. Wets, (1981)) with varying amounts of local search being incorporated into the evolutionary algorithm. Empirical results indicate that FEP with the conjugate gradient method outperforms other hybrid methods on three of the four functions when evolution was conducted for a fixed number of generations. Trials using local search produced solutions that were statistically as good as or better than trials without local search. However, the cost of using local search justified the enhancement in solution quality only when using Gaussian mutations but not when using Cauchy mutations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.1999.782662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.1999.782662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

已有研究表明,在经典进化规划(EP)中嵌入局部搜索可以提高函数优化问题的性能。利用快速进化规划(FEP)方法研究了局部搜索的有效性,并比较了高斯突变和柯西突变下局部搜索的性能改进。利用两种局部搜索方法(共轭梯度和F.J. Solis和R.J.-B)对四种已知的函数优化问题进行了实验。Wets,(1981)),在进化算法中加入了不同数量的局部搜索。实证结果表明,当进化进行固定世代数时,共轭梯度法的FEP在四个功能中的三个功能上优于其他混合方法。使用局部搜索的试验产生的解决方案在统计上与不使用局部搜索的试验一样好,甚至更好。然而,使用局部搜索的成本证明了只有在使用高斯突变时才能提高解的质量,而在使用柯西突变时则不然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local search operators in fast evolutionary programming
Previous studies have shown that embedding local search in classical evolutionary programming (EP) could lead to improved performance on function optimization problems. The utility of local search is investigated with fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and comparisons are offered between performance improvements obtained when using local search with Gaussian and Cauchy mutations. Experiments were conducted on a suite of four well known function optimization problems using two local search methods (conjugate gradient and F.J. Solis and R.J.-B. Wets, (1981)) with varying amounts of local search being incorporated into the evolutionary algorithm. Empirical results indicate that FEP with the conjugate gradient method outperforms other hybrid methods on three of the four functions when evolution was conducted for a fixed number of generations. Trials using local search produced solutions that were statistically as good as or better than trials without local search. However, the cost of using local search justified the enhancement in solution quality only when using Gaussian mutations but not when using Cauchy mutations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信