胸部CT投影域肺结节插入技术的评价

Chi Ma, Baiyu Chen, C. W. Koo, E. Takahashi, J. Fletcher, C. McCollough, D. Levin, R. Kuzo, Lyndsay D. Viers, Stephanie A. Vincent Sheldon, S. Leng, Lifeng Yu
{"title":"胸部CT投影域肺结节插入技术的评价","authors":"Chi Ma, Baiyu Chen, C. W. Koo, E. Takahashi, J. Fletcher, C. McCollough, D. Levin, R. Kuzo, Lyndsay D. Viers, Stephanie A. Vincent Sheldon, S. Leng, Lifeng Yu","doi":"10.1117/12.2217009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Task-based assessment of computed tomography (CT) image quality requires a large number of cases with ground truth. Inserting lesions into existing cases to simulate positive cases is a promising alternative approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate a recently-developed raw-data based lesion insertion technique in thoracic CT. Lung lesions were segmented from patient CT images, forward projected, and reinserted into the same patient CT projection data. In total, 32 nodules of various attenuations were segmented from 21 CT cases. Two experienced radiologists and 2 residents blinded to the process independently evaluated these inserted nodules in two sub-studies. First, the 32 inserted and the 32 original nodules were presented in a randomized order and each received a rating score from 1 to 10 (1=absolutely artificial to 10=absolutely realistic). Second, the inserted and the corresponding original lesions were presented side-by-side to each reader, who identified the inserted lesion and provided a confidence score (1=no confidence to 5=completely certain). For the randomized evaluation, discrimination of real versus artificial nodules was poor with areas under the receiver operative characteristic curves being 0.69 (95% CI: 0.58-0.78), 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.69) for the 2 radiologists, 2 residents, and all 4 readers, respectively. For the side-by-side evaluation, although all 4 readers correctly identified inserted lesions in 103/128 pairs, the confidence score was moderate (2.6). Our projection-domain based lung nodule insertion technique provides a robust method to artificially generate clinical cases that prove to be difficult to differentiate from real cases.","PeriodicalId":228011,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Medical Imaging","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a projection-domain lung nodule insertion technique in thoracic CT\",\"authors\":\"Chi Ma, Baiyu Chen, C. W. Koo, E. Takahashi, J. Fletcher, C. McCollough, D. Levin, R. Kuzo, Lyndsay D. Viers, Stephanie A. Vincent Sheldon, S. Leng, Lifeng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2217009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Task-based assessment of computed tomography (CT) image quality requires a large number of cases with ground truth. Inserting lesions into existing cases to simulate positive cases is a promising alternative approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate a recently-developed raw-data based lesion insertion technique in thoracic CT. Lung lesions were segmented from patient CT images, forward projected, and reinserted into the same patient CT projection data. In total, 32 nodules of various attenuations were segmented from 21 CT cases. Two experienced radiologists and 2 residents blinded to the process independently evaluated these inserted nodules in two sub-studies. First, the 32 inserted and the 32 original nodules were presented in a randomized order and each received a rating score from 1 to 10 (1=absolutely artificial to 10=absolutely realistic). Second, the inserted and the corresponding original lesions were presented side-by-side to each reader, who identified the inserted lesion and provided a confidence score (1=no confidence to 5=completely certain). For the randomized evaluation, discrimination of real versus artificial nodules was poor with areas under the receiver operative characteristic curves being 0.69 (95% CI: 0.58-0.78), 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.69) for the 2 radiologists, 2 residents, and all 4 readers, respectively. For the side-by-side evaluation, although all 4 readers correctly identified inserted lesions in 103/128 pairs, the confidence score was moderate (2.6). Our projection-domain based lung nodule insertion technique provides a robust method to artificially generate clinical cases that prove to be difficult to differentiate from real cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPIE Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPIE Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

基于任务的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像质量评估需要大量的真实案例。在现有病例中插入病变以模拟阳性病例是一种很有前途的替代方法。本研究的目的是评估最近发展的基于原始数据的胸部CT病变插入技术。从患者CT图像中分割肺部病变,向前投影,并重新插入到相同的患者CT投影数据中。共从21例CT上分割出32个不同程度衰减的结节。两名经验丰富的放射科医生和两名不知情的住院医生在两个亚研究中独立评估了这些插入结节。首先,32个插入的结节和32个原始结节按随机顺序呈现,每个结节获得1到10的评分(1=绝对人工到10=绝对真实)。其次,将插入的病变和相应的原始病变并排呈现给每位读者,由读者识别插入的病变并给出置信度评分(1=无置信度至5=完全确定)。在随机评价中,2名放射科医生、2名住院医生和所有4名读者对真实结节和人工结节的辨别能力较差,分别为0.69 (95% CI: 0.58-0.78)、0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68)和0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.69)。对于并排评估,虽然所有4位读者在103/128对中正确识别插入病变,但置信度评分为中等(2.6)。我们基于投影域的肺结节插入技术提供了一种强大的方法来人工生成临床病例,这些病例被证明很难与真实病例区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a projection-domain lung nodule insertion technique in thoracic CT
Task-based assessment of computed tomography (CT) image quality requires a large number of cases with ground truth. Inserting lesions into existing cases to simulate positive cases is a promising alternative approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate a recently-developed raw-data based lesion insertion technique in thoracic CT. Lung lesions were segmented from patient CT images, forward projected, and reinserted into the same patient CT projection data. In total, 32 nodules of various attenuations were segmented from 21 CT cases. Two experienced radiologists and 2 residents blinded to the process independently evaluated these inserted nodules in two sub-studies. First, the 32 inserted and the 32 original nodules were presented in a randomized order and each received a rating score from 1 to 10 (1=absolutely artificial to 10=absolutely realistic). Second, the inserted and the corresponding original lesions were presented side-by-side to each reader, who identified the inserted lesion and provided a confidence score (1=no confidence to 5=completely certain). For the randomized evaluation, discrimination of real versus artificial nodules was poor with areas under the receiver operative characteristic curves being 0.69 (95% CI: 0.58-0.78), 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.69) for the 2 radiologists, 2 residents, and all 4 readers, respectively. For the side-by-side evaluation, although all 4 readers correctly identified inserted lesions in 103/128 pairs, the confidence score was moderate (2.6). Our projection-domain based lung nodule insertion technique provides a robust method to artificially generate clinical cases that prove to be difficult to differentiate from real cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信