根尖周围病变:目前的模式

Verica Toneva Stojmenova, Sonja Rogoleva Gjurovski
{"title":"根尖周围病变:目前的模式","authors":"Verica Toneva Stojmenova, Sonja Rogoleva Gjurovski","doi":"10.35120/medisij010125t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In cases with periapical lesions, there are two types of treatment modalities: noninvasive and invasive. The first one noninvasive is also known as nonsurgical or endodontic treatment. The second one – invasive method is surgical approach. In some cases, there is a need for combination of both aproaches. In everydays clinical treatment, the first choice is less invasive method and has better outcomes. Treatment of some periapical lesions (like cysts) are a theme of discussion and we do not have best option to treat them. The patient should make the definitive decision about the treatment. The doctor should inform him about the advantages and disadvantages of endodontic-noninvasive and surgical-invasive procedure. The therapeutic modalities for these pathologies are a wide range of treatment from endodontic treatment to different surgical options. We like to find out and present the best way about healing the periapical lesion. We wanted to know whenever surgical or non-surgical approach is better, and if using them might improve healing of those pathologies. The aim was clear and to reach it, we make an electronic search of medical and dental literature. We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed and Embase Ovid. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to reach the aim of this review study. We place restriction about language (only those articles that are written on English) and publication date (articles that are not older than 2010 year). We excluded duplicate article. We searched the references of the studies that we included for those review. We searched by hand the reference list of the studies and journals in the fields of endodontics and oral surgery. Every periapical lesion should firstly begin with good performed endodontic treatment. In some cases, there is a need for surgical approach of periapical pathologies because the endodontic treatment is not successful. Some cases might fail because of multipurpose factors such as: foreign body reaction, the size of the periapical lesion, biofilm, oral health and oral hygiene. A surgical approach is an option in cases when periapical lesion is large. Marsupialization might be the adequate option of treatment for those lesions in some cases. In cases with postoperative periapical lesion there is a need for surgical retrograde treatment. The procedure can be performed with hand endodontic instruments to make mechanical treatment of the root canal especially the part that is untreated. The advantages, disadvantages and modalities of treatment of periapical lesions are discussed in this review. According to these review there is no evidence that the first approach leads to better results compared to the second approach. This conclusion is based on electronic research of the literature database and clinical trials. There are several options for treatment to eliminate the clinical problems of periapical lesions but furder research is necessary. This review article is about the benefits of both approaches, and to determinate the best treatment modalities of cases with periapical pathologies, healing and postoperative quality of dental life.","PeriodicalId":446210,"journal":{"name":"MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERIAPICAL LESIONS: CURRENT MODALITIES\",\"authors\":\"Verica Toneva Stojmenova, Sonja Rogoleva Gjurovski\",\"doi\":\"10.35120/medisij010125t\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In cases with periapical lesions, there are two types of treatment modalities: noninvasive and invasive. The first one noninvasive is also known as nonsurgical or endodontic treatment. The second one – invasive method is surgical approach. In some cases, there is a need for combination of both aproaches. In everydays clinical treatment, the first choice is less invasive method and has better outcomes. Treatment of some periapical lesions (like cysts) are a theme of discussion and we do not have best option to treat them. The patient should make the definitive decision about the treatment. The doctor should inform him about the advantages and disadvantages of endodontic-noninvasive and surgical-invasive procedure. The therapeutic modalities for these pathologies are a wide range of treatment from endodontic treatment to different surgical options. We like to find out and present the best way about healing the periapical lesion. We wanted to know whenever surgical or non-surgical approach is better, and if using them might improve healing of those pathologies. The aim was clear and to reach it, we make an electronic search of medical and dental literature. We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed and Embase Ovid. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to reach the aim of this review study. We place restriction about language (only those articles that are written on English) and publication date (articles that are not older than 2010 year). We excluded duplicate article. We searched the references of the studies that we included for those review. We searched by hand the reference list of the studies and journals in the fields of endodontics and oral surgery. Every periapical lesion should firstly begin with good performed endodontic treatment. In some cases, there is a need for surgical approach of periapical pathologies because the endodontic treatment is not successful. Some cases might fail because of multipurpose factors such as: foreign body reaction, the size of the periapical lesion, biofilm, oral health and oral hygiene. A surgical approach is an option in cases when periapical lesion is large. Marsupialization might be the adequate option of treatment for those lesions in some cases. In cases with postoperative periapical lesion there is a need for surgical retrograde treatment. The procedure can be performed with hand endodontic instruments to make mechanical treatment of the root canal especially the part that is untreated. The advantages, disadvantages and modalities of treatment of periapical lesions are discussed in this review. According to these review there is no evidence that the first approach leads to better results compared to the second approach. This conclusion is based on electronic research of the literature database and clinical trials. There are several options for treatment to eliminate the clinical problems of periapical lesions but furder research is necessary. This review article is about the benefits of both approaches, and to determinate the best treatment modalities of cases with periapical pathologies, healing and postoperative quality of dental life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij010125t\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDIS – International Journal of Medical Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35120/medisij010125t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在根尖周围病变的情况下,有两种类型的治疗方式:非侵入性和侵入性。第一种非侵入性治疗也被称为非手术治疗或牙髓治疗。第二种侵入性方法是手术入路。在某些情况下,需要将这两种方法结合起来。在日常临床治疗中,首选的方法是创伤小,效果好。一些根尖周围病变(如囊肿)的治疗是讨论的主题,我们没有最好的选择来治疗它们。病人应该对治疗作出明确的决定。医生应告知患者牙髓非侵入性和外科侵入性手术的优缺点。这些病理的治疗方式是广泛的治疗,从牙髓治疗到不同的手术选择。我们希望找出并提出治疗根尖周围病变的最佳方法。我们想知道手术或非手术治疗哪种方法更好,以及使用它们是否可以改善这些病理的愈合。目的很明确,为了达到目的,我们对医学和牙科文献进行了电子检索。我们检索了以下电子数据库:PubMed和Embase Ovid。采用纳入和排除标准来达到本综述研究的目的。我们对语言(仅限那些用英语写的文章)和出版日期(不超过2010年的文章)进行了限制。我们排除了重复的商品。我们检索了我们纳入这些综述的研究的参考文献。我们手工检索了牙髓学和口腔外科领域的研究和期刊参考文献。每一个根尖周围病变都应该首先进行良好的根管治疗。在某些情况下,由于根管治疗不成功,需要手术治疗根尖周围病变。由于异物反应、根尖周病变大小、生物膜、口腔健康和口腔卫生等多种因素的影响,部分病例可能无法成功。当根尖周围病变较大时,手术方法是一种选择。在某些情况下,有袋化可能是治疗这些病变的适当选择。对于术后根尖周围病变的病例,需要手术逆行治疗。该过程可以用手根管器械进行机械处理,特别是对未治疗的根管部分。本文讨论了根尖周围病变的优点、缺点和治疗方法。根据这些综述,没有证据表明第一种方法比第二种方法产生更好的结果。这一结论是基于文献数据库的电子研究和临床试验。有几种治疗方案,以消除临床问题的根尖周围病变,但进一步的研究是必要的。这篇综述文章是关于这两种方法的好处,并确定最佳治疗方式的病例根尖周病变,愈合和术后牙齿生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERIAPICAL LESIONS: CURRENT MODALITIES
In cases with periapical lesions, there are two types of treatment modalities: noninvasive and invasive. The first one noninvasive is also known as nonsurgical or endodontic treatment. The second one – invasive method is surgical approach. In some cases, there is a need for combination of both aproaches. In everydays clinical treatment, the first choice is less invasive method and has better outcomes. Treatment of some periapical lesions (like cysts) are a theme of discussion and we do not have best option to treat them. The patient should make the definitive decision about the treatment. The doctor should inform him about the advantages and disadvantages of endodontic-noninvasive and surgical-invasive procedure. The therapeutic modalities for these pathologies are a wide range of treatment from endodontic treatment to different surgical options. We like to find out and present the best way about healing the periapical lesion. We wanted to know whenever surgical or non-surgical approach is better, and if using them might improve healing of those pathologies. The aim was clear and to reach it, we make an electronic search of medical and dental literature. We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed and Embase Ovid. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to reach the aim of this review study. We place restriction about language (only those articles that are written on English) and publication date (articles that are not older than 2010 year). We excluded duplicate article. We searched the references of the studies that we included for those review. We searched by hand the reference list of the studies and journals in the fields of endodontics and oral surgery. Every periapical lesion should firstly begin with good performed endodontic treatment. In some cases, there is a need for surgical approach of periapical pathologies because the endodontic treatment is not successful. Some cases might fail because of multipurpose factors such as: foreign body reaction, the size of the periapical lesion, biofilm, oral health and oral hygiene. A surgical approach is an option in cases when periapical lesion is large. Marsupialization might be the adequate option of treatment for those lesions in some cases. In cases with postoperative periapical lesion there is a need for surgical retrograde treatment. The procedure can be performed with hand endodontic instruments to make mechanical treatment of the root canal especially the part that is untreated. The advantages, disadvantages and modalities of treatment of periapical lesions are discussed in this review. According to these review there is no evidence that the first approach leads to better results compared to the second approach. This conclusion is based on electronic research of the literature database and clinical trials. There are several options for treatment to eliminate the clinical problems of periapical lesions but furder research is necessary. This review article is about the benefits of both approaches, and to determinate the best treatment modalities of cases with periapical pathologies, healing and postoperative quality of dental life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信