利率劫持:基于风险和机会的信用卡定价

Adam J. Levitin
{"title":"利率劫持:基于风险和机会的信用卡定价","authors":"Adam J. Levitin","doi":"10.5072/ULR.V2011I2.564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article, part of a theme-volume on the Credit C.A.R.D. Act, explores the phenomenon of credit card “rate-jacking” — the practice of card issuers suddenly raising the interest rate on an account, often applying the new rate retroactively to existing balances. This Article examines the degree to which rate-jacking — now largely prohibited by the Credit C.A.R.D. Act — and credit card pricing generally reflects risk-based or opportunistic pricing.","PeriodicalId":198490,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Law Center Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate-Jacking: Risk-Based and Opportunistic Pricing in Credit Cards\",\"authors\":\"Adam J. Levitin\",\"doi\":\"10.5072/ULR.V2011I2.564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article, part of a theme-volume on the Credit C.A.R.D. Act, explores the phenomenon of credit card “rate-jacking” — the practice of card issuers suddenly raising the interest rate on an account, often applying the new rate retroactively to existing balances. This Article examines the degree to which rate-jacking — now largely prohibited by the Credit C.A.R.D. Act — and credit card pricing generally reflects risk-based or opportunistic pricing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown Law Center Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown Law Center Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2011I2.564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Law Center Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2011I2.564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文是《信用C.A.R.D.法案》主题卷的一部分,探讨了信用卡“利率劫持”现象——发卡机构突然提高账户利率的做法,通常将新的利率追溯至现有余额。本文考察了利率劫持在多大程度上反映了基于风险的或机会主义的定价。目前,利率劫持在很大程度上被《信贷信贷法案》所禁止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rate-Jacking: Risk-Based and Opportunistic Pricing in Credit Cards
This Article, part of a theme-volume on the Credit C.A.R.D. Act, explores the phenomenon of credit card “rate-jacking” — the practice of card issuers suddenly raising the interest rate on an account, often applying the new rate retroactively to existing balances. This Article examines the degree to which rate-jacking — now largely prohibited by the Credit C.A.R.D. Act — and credit card pricing generally reflects risk-based or opportunistic pricing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信