论网络赌博犯罪中基于特损法原则的法律适用(第232/PID.B/2022/PN.CBD号决定)

Mela Meiliawati
{"title":"论网络赌博犯罪中基于特损法原则的法律适用(第232/PID.B/2022/PN.CBD号决定)","authors":"Mela Meiliawati","doi":"10.55849/rjl.v1i4.492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The existence of internet technology can make it easier for people to get information and facilitate communication, but the internet can also have a negative impact on society, one of which is a medium for finding information or sites that contain gambling. This can change the pattern of ordinary or conventional gambling to gambling with internet media or what is commonly called online gambling, so that it can be accessed anytime and by anyone.\nPurpose. Gambling is a prohibited act as stipulated in Article 303 of the Criminal Code, 303 bis of the Criminal Code, and Article 27 paragraph (2) of the Law on information and electronic transactions. In verdict number 233/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd the author found a discrepancy in the application of the article, so the problem in this study is \"How is the application of the law of online gambling in verdict number 232/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd?\".\nMethod. This research uses normative juridical types contained in laws and court decisions, as well as legal norms that exist in society.\nResults. The results in this study are that the public prosecutor's indictment has used a single charge by applying article 303 paragraph (1) 2 of the Criminal Code and the judge has decided in accordance with the public prosecutor's indictment.\nConclusion. This can make law enforcers override the principle of lex spesialis derogate legi lex generalis, because they do not apply article 27 paragraph (2) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law.","PeriodicalId":349644,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Law Based on the Principle of Lex Spesialis Derogat Legi Lex Generalis in the Crime of Online Gambling (Decision Number 232/PID.B/2022/PN.CBD)\",\"authors\":\"Mela Meiliawati\",\"doi\":\"10.55849/rjl.v1i4.492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The existence of internet technology can make it easier for people to get information and facilitate communication, but the internet can also have a negative impact on society, one of which is a medium for finding information or sites that contain gambling. This can change the pattern of ordinary or conventional gambling to gambling with internet media or what is commonly called online gambling, so that it can be accessed anytime and by anyone.\\nPurpose. Gambling is a prohibited act as stipulated in Article 303 of the Criminal Code, 303 bis of the Criminal Code, and Article 27 paragraph (2) of the Law on information and electronic transactions. In verdict number 233/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd the author found a discrepancy in the application of the article, so the problem in this study is \\\"How is the application of the law of online gambling in verdict number 232/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd?\\\".\\nMethod. This research uses normative juridical types contained in laws and court decisions, as well as legal norms that exist in society.\\nResults. The results in this study are that the public prosecutor's indictment has used a single charge by applying article 303 paragraph (1) 2 of the Criminal Code and the judge has decided in accordance with the public prosecutor's indictment.\\nConclusion. This can make law enforcers override the principle of lex spesialis derogate legi lex generalis, because they do not apply article 27 paragraph (2) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55849/rjl.v1i4.492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsnormen Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55849/rjl.v1i4.492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。互联网技术的存在可以使人们更容易获得信息和促进交流,但互联网也可以对社会产生负面影响,其中之一是寻找信息或包含赌博的网站的媒介。这可以改变普通或传统赌博的模式,通过网络媒体赌博或通常被称为在线赌博,从而可以随时随地访问它。赌博是刑法第303条、刑法第303条之二、信息电子交易法第27条第(2)项规定的禁止行为。第233号判决书/Pid.B/2022/Pn。笔者在文章的适用中发现了一个差异,所以本研究的问题是“232/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd号判决书中网络赌博法的适用情况如何?”本研究使用了包含在法律和法院判决中的规范性司法类型,以及存在于社会中的法律规范。本研究的结果是,公诉人的起诉书采用了《刑法》第303条第(1)款第2项的单一指控,法官根据公诉人的起诉书作出了判决。这可以使执法人员无视特别法减损一般法的原则,因为他们不适用《电子信息和交易法》第27条第(2)款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Law Based on the Principle of Lex Spesialis Derogat Legi Lex Generalis in the Crime of Online Gambling (Decision Number 232/PID.B/2022/PN.CBD)
Background. The existence of internet technology can make it easier for people to get information and facilitate communication, but the internet can also have a negative impact on society, one of which is a medium for finding information or sites that contain gambling. This can change the pattern of ordinary or conventional gambling to gambling with internet media or what is commonly called online gambling, so that it can be accessed anytime and by anyone. Purpose. Gambling is a prohibited act as stipulated in Article 303 of the Criminal Code, 303 bis of the Criminal Code, and Article 27 paragraph (2) of the Law on information and electronic transactions. In verdict number 233/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd the author found a discrepancy in the application of the article, so the problem in this study is "How is the application of the law of online gambling in verdict number 232/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Cbd?". Method. This research uses normative juridical types contained in laws and court decisions, as well as legal norms that exist in society. Results. The results in this study are that the public prosecutor's indictment has used a single charge by applying article 303 paragraph (1) 2 of the Criminal Code and the judge has decided in accordance with the public prosecutor's indictment. Conclusion. This can make law enforcers override the principle of lex spesialis derogate legi lex generalis, because they do not apply article 27 paragraph (2) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信