矛盾的位置

Ilana Feldman
{"title":"矛盾的位置","authors":"Ilana Feldman","doi":"10.1525/california/9780520299627.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores tensions in humanitarian relations. These relations contain both suspicion and compassion. Specifically, it considers the complexities of humanitarian subject positions, conflicts over humanitarian obligations, and dilemmas of humanitarian purpose. Some humanitarian workers are internationals; the majority are themselves refugees. Some refugee are paid for their work; others are volunteers. All of these positions are fraught. Providers and refugees also struggle over the nature and limits of humanitarian obligations. UNRWA’s mandate has expanded to include protection, but refugees also want representation. As threats to life recede, but need continues, the purpose of humanitarian action also becomes murky and contested. Humanitarians suggest that coping skills can be a humanitarian good. Recipients question whether bearing up under bad conditions can ever be enough.","PeriodicalId":422310,"journal":{"name":"Life Lived in Relief","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflicted Positions\",\"authors\":\"Ilana Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/california/9780520299627.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores tensions in humanitarian relations. These relations contain both suspicion and compassion. Specifically, it considers the complexities of humanitarian subject positions, conflicts over humanitarian obligations, and dilemmas of humanitarian purpose. Some humanitarian workers are internationals; the majority are themselves refugees. Some refugee are paid for their work; others are volunteers. All of these positions are fraught. Providers and refugees also struggle over the nature and limits of humanitarian obligations. UNRWA’s mandate has expanded to include protection, but refugees also want representation. As threats to life recede, but need continues, the purpose of humanitarian action also becomes murky and contested. Humanitarians suggest that coping skills can be a humanitarian good. Recipients question whether bearing up under bad conditions can ever be enough.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life Lived in Relief\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life Lived in Relief\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520299627.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Lived in Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520299627.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨人道主义关系中的紧张局势。这些关系中既有怀疑,也有同情。具体来说,它考虑了人道主义主体立场的复杂性、人道主义义务的冲突以及人道主义目的的困境。一些人道主义工作者是国际工作者;其中大多数人本身就是难民。有些难民的工作是有报酬的;其他人则是志愿者。所有这些立场都令人担忧。提供者和难民也在人道主义义务的性质和限制上争论不休。近东救济工程处的任务已经扩大到包括保护,但难民也想要代表。随着对生命的威胁消退,但需求仍在继续,人道主义行动的目的也变得模糊和有争议。人道主义者认为,应对技能可以是一种人道主义善行。受助者质疑,在恶劣条件下的忍耐是否足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflicted Positions
This chapter explores tensions in humanitarian relations. These relations contain both suspicion and compassion. Specifically, it considers the complexities of humanitarian subject positions, conflicts over humanitarian obligations, and dilemmas of humanitarian purpose. Some humanitarian workers are internationals; the majority are themselves refugees. Some refugee are paid for their work; others are volunteers. All of these positions are fraught. Providers and refugees also struggle over the nature and limits of humanitarian obligations. UNRWA’s mandate has expanded to include protection, but refugees also want representation. As threats to life recede, but need continues, the purpose of humanitarian action also becomes murky and contested. Humanitarians suggest that coping skills can be a humanitarian good. Recipients question whether bearing up under bad conditions can ever be enough.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信