嵌入式处理器的缓存组织:cam -vs . sram

B. Mohammad, P. Bassett, J. Abraham, A. Aziz
{"title":"嵌入式处理器的缓存组织:cam -vs . sram","authors":"B. Mohammad, P. Bassett, J. Abraham, A. Aziz","doi":"10.1109/SOCC.2006.283902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caches are becoming an increasingly important part of embedded processor design because of the impact they have on performance as well as implementation, specifically, area, power and timing. Different cache organizations make tradeoffs between these metrics. One of the main architectural choices is whether to use standard SRAM-based tag design or to go with a CAM- based organization. This choice has far reaching consequences on all other aspects of the cache design. We will compare these two cache styles using results from a recently completed DSP core design. Our conclusion is that, contrary to popular belief, an SRAM-tag based design provided a more optimal overall design point and is superior in energy respect. Some of driving factors such as the increasing dominance of wire and leakage power will be extrapolated forward to next generation processes.","PeriodicalId":345714,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE International SOC Conference","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cache Organization for Embeded Processors: CAM-vs-SRAM\",\"authors\":\"B. Mohammad, P. Bassett, J. Abraham, A. Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOCC.2006.283902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caches are becoming an increasingly important part of embedded processor design because of the impact they have on performance as well as implementation, specifically, area, power and timing. Different cache organizations make tradeoffs between these metrics. One of the main architectural choices is whether to use standard SRAM-based tag design or to go with a CAM- based organization. This choice has far reaching consequences on all other aspects of the cache design. We will compare these two cache styles using results from a recently completed DSP core design. Our conclusion is that, contrary to popular belief, an SRAM-tag based design provided a more optimal overall design point and is superior in energy respect. Some of driving factors such as the increasing dominance of wire and leakage power will be extrapolated forward to next generation processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE International SOC Conference\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE International SOC Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCC.2006.283902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE International SOC Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCC.2006.283902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

缓存正成为嵌入式处理器设计中越来越重要的一部分,因为它们对性能和实现(特别是面积、功耗和时间)都有影响。不同的缓存组织在这些指标之间进行权衡。一个主要的架构选择是使用标准的基于sram的标签设计还是使用基于CAM的组织。这种选择对缓存设计的所有其他方面都有深远的影响。我们将使用最近完成的DSP核心设计的结果来比较这两种缓存样式。我们的结论是,与普遍的看法相反,基于sram标签的设计提供了更优化的整体设计点,并且在能量方面更优越。一些驱动因素,如电线和泄漏功率的日益占主导地位,将被外推到下一代工艺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cache Organization for Embeded Processors: CAM-vs-SRAM
Caches are becoming an increasingly important part of embedded processor design because of the impact they have on performance as well as implementation, specifically, area, power and timing. Different cache organizations make tradeoffs between these metrics. One of the main architectural choices is whether to use standard SRAM-based tag design or to go with a CAM- based organization. This choice has far reaching consequences on all other aspects of the cache design. We will compare these two cache styles using results from a recently completed DSP core design. Our conclusion is that, contrary to popular belief, an SRAM-tag based design provided a more optimal overall design point and is superior in energy respect. Some of driving factors such as the increasing dominance of wire and leakage power will be extrapolated forward to next generation processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信