剥削性虐待:最近的趋势和比较观点

M. Botta
{"title":"剥削性虐待:最近的趋势和比较观点","authors":"M. Botta","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3909894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter discusses the ‘revival’ of exploitative abuses in Europe. In particular, the chapter analyses the legal test and recent enforcement trends concerning excessive and discriminatory pricing, as well as unfair trading conditions under Art. 102 TFEU. The chapter concludes that the revival of exploitative abuses is taking place in specific industries (i.e. energy, pharmaceutical, and digital markets) and only in relation to excessive prices and unfair trading conditions. By contrast, cases sanctioning discriminatory pricing remain extremely rare. In digital markets, the revival of exploitative abuses has mostly concerned unfair trading conditions. The peculiarities of digital markets (i.e. close to zero marginal costs, winner takes all dynamics, and zero-price markets) make it hard for a competition agency to assess an excessive pricing case under the United Brands test and the benchmarking approach. Finally, sector regulation may solve the market failures causing exploitative abuses, but thus making competition law enforcement ‘redundant’.","PeriodicalId":306463,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploitative Abuses: Recent Trends and Comparative Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"M. Botta\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3909894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chapter discusses the ‘revival’ of exploitative abuses in Europe. In particular, the chapter analyses the legal test and recent enforcement trends concerning excessive and discriminatory pricing, as well as unfair trading conditions under Art. 102 TFEU. The chapter concludes that the revival of exploitative abuses is taking place in specific industries (i.e. energy, pharmaceutical, and digital markets) and only in relation to excessive prices and unfair trading conditions. By contrast, cases sanctioning discriminatory pricing remain extremely rare. In digital markets, the revival of exploitative abuses has mostly concerned unfair trading conditions. The peculiarities of digital markets (i.e. close to zero marginal costs, winner takes all dynamics, and zero-price markets) make it hard for a competition agency to assess an excessive pricing case under the United Brands test and the benchmarking approach. Finally, sector regulation may solve the market failures causing exploitative abuses, but thus making competition law enforcement ‘redundant’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Public Law - Antitrust (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章讨论了欧洲剥削虐待的“复兴”。本章特别分析了关于过度和歧视性定价的法律检验和最近的执法趋势,以及根据《贸易法》第102条规定的不公平贸易条件。本章的结论是,剥削性滥用的复苏正在特定行业(即能源,制药和数字市场)中发生,并且仅与过高的价格和不公平的交易条件有关。相比之下,制裁歧视性定价的案例仍然极为罕见。在数字市场中,剥削性滥用的重现主要与不公平的交易条件有关。数字市场的特殊性(即接近于零边际成本,赢家通吃动态和零价格市场)使得竞争机构很难在联合品牌测试和基准方法下评估过度定价案例。最后,部门监管可能解决导致剥削性滥用的市场失灵,但因此使竞争法执法“多余”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploitative Abuses: Recent Trends and Comparative Perspectives
The chapter discusses the ‘revival’ of exploitative abuses in Europe. In particular, the chapter analyses the legal test and recent enforcement trends concerning excessive and discriminatory pricing, as well as unfair trading conditions under Art. 102 TFEU. The chapter concludes that the revival of exploitative abuses is taking place in specific industries (i.e. energy, pharmaceutical, and digital markets) and only in relation to excessive prices and unfair trading conditions. By contrast, cases sanctioning discriminatory pricing remain extremely rare. In digital markets, the revival of exploitative abuses has mostly concerned unfair trading conditions. The peculiarities of digital markets (i.e. close to zero marginal costs, winner takes all dynamics, and zero-price markets) make it hard for a competition agency to assess an excessive pricing case under the United Brands test and the benchmarking approach. Finally, sector regulation may solve the market failures causing exploitative abuses, but thus making competition law enforcement ‘redundant’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信