强奸检控过程中的直肠检查

Ardhya Fauzah Fardhyanti, Puti Priyana
{"title":"强奸检控过程中的直肠检查","authors":"Ardhya Fauzah Fardhyanti, Puti Priyana","doi":"10.31328/wy.v5i2.3589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visum et Repertum is written by a doctor according to what he saw and found on living, corpses, or physical evidence and then analyzed based on his knowledge. Doctors are given the whole task at the time of making the visum et repertum as organizers in the field in facilitating the smooth running of the investigation, helping prosecutors determine the direction of the indictment, and making it easier for judges to find material truth in making decisions. This type of research is normative law research, a method to find the truth based on literature using legal literature materials, applicable laws and regulations, official documents, and other media to obtain data or theories related to the research problem product. The nature of the research used is descriptive, which seeks to describe the object or subject under study following what it is. Although, based on the Visum Et Repertum Number dated December 10, 2020, no injuries were found, the Panel of Judges did not have to stick to the evidence for the Visum Et Repertum. Because experts or doctors are just ordinary people who are likely to make mistakes, judges are not required to follow the opinion of the experts or doctors if it is not follow what they believe. The power of Visum et Repertum is considered necessary in proving the crime of rape because it can the truth be found whether the crime occurred. However, Visum et Repertum cannot stand alone and must be supported by other","PeriodicalId":106813,"journal":{"name":"Widya Yuridika","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visum Et Repertum Dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Pemerkosaan\",\"authors\":\"Ardhya Fauzah Fardhyanti, Puti Priyana\",\"doi\":\"10.31328/wy.v5i2.3589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Visum et Repertum is written by a doctor according to what he saw and found on living, corpses, or physical evidence and then analyzed based on his knowledge. Doctors are given the whole task at the time of making the visum et repertum as organizers in the field in facilitating the smooth running of the investigation, helping prosecutors determine the direction of the indictment, and making it easier for judges to find material truth in making decisions. This type of research is normative law research, a method to find the truth based on literature using legal literature materials, applicable laws and regulations, official documents, and other media to obtain data or theories related to the research problem product. The nature of the research used is descriptive, which seeks to describe the object or subject under study following what it is. Although, based on the Visum Et Repertum Number dated December 10, 2020, no injuries were found, the Panel of Judges did not have to stick to the evidence for the Visum Et Repertum. Because experts or doctors are just ordinary people who are likely to make mistakes, judges are not required to follow the opinion of the experts or doctors if it is not follow what they believe. The power of Visum et Repertum is considered necessary in proving the crime of rape because it can the truth be found whether the crime occurred. However, Visum et Repertum cannot stand alone and must be supported by other\",\"PeriodicalId\":106813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Widya Yuridika\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Widya Yuridika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widya Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

《Visum et Repertum》是医生根据自己在活人、尸体或物证上的所见所闻写的,然后根据自己的知识进行分析。医生作为现场的组织者,在制定议事日程的同时,也承担着促进调查的顺利进行、帮助检察官确定起诉方向、帮助法官在做出判决时更容易找到实质性事实的全部任务。这类研究是规范法研究,是一种以文献为基础,利用法律文献资料、适用法律法规、官方文件等媒介,获取与研究问题产品相关的数据或理论,寻找真相的方法。所使用的研究的性质是描述性的,它试图描述所研究的对象或主题。尽管根据日期为2020年12月10日的Visum Et Repertum Number,没有发现任何伤害,但法官小组不必坚持Visum Et Repertum的证据。因为专家或医生只是普通人,他们可能会犯错误,如果专家或医生的意见不是他们所相信的,法官就不需要遵循专家或医生的意见。在证明强奸罪的过程中,可以查明是否发生了强奸罪的真相,因此有必要使用“证据与程序”。然而,“对话与剧目”不能单独存在,必须得到其他方面的支持
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visum Et Repertum Dalam Proses Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Pemerkosaan
Visum et Repertum is written by a doctor according to what he saw and found on living, corpses, or physical evidence and then analyzed based on his knowledge. Doctors are given the whole task at the time of making the visum et repertum as organizers in the field in facilitating the smooth running of the investigation, helping prosecutors determine the direction of the indictment, and making it easier for judges to find material truth in making decisions. This type of research is normative law research, a method to find the truth based on literature using legal literature materials, applicable laws and regulations, official documents, and other media to obtain data or theories related to the research problem product. The nature of the research used is descriptive, which seeks to describe the object or subject under study following what it is. Although, based on the Visum Et Repertum Number dated December 10, 2020, no injuries were found, the Panel of Judges did not have to stick to the evidence for the Visum Et Repertum. Because experts or doctors are just ordinary people who are likely to make mistakes, judges are not required to follow the opinion of the experts or doctors if it is not follow what they believe. The power of Visum et Repertum is considered necessary in proving the crime of rape because it can the truth be found whether the crime occurred. However, Visum et Repertum cannot stand alone and must be supported by other
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信