{"title":"技术与推广:打字机","authors":"R. N. Current","doi":"10.1017/S0007680500024466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inventor does the work and the promoter gets the money. That seems to sum up the popular view of the relation between promotion and technology in nineteenth-century America. Take the typewriter as an example. Thomas A. Edison declared in 1921: “Mr. Christopher L. Sholes was the father of the typewriter and got nothing but trouble and neglect in connection with the invention. He fell into the hands of promoters with the usual results.” Who were these promoters? Edison did not name names, but chief among them were in fact the following: James Densmore, George Washington Newton Yost, the firm of E. Remington & Sons, and finally the latter's selling agents—Wyckoff, Seamans, and Benedict—who in 1886 bought the Remingtons' typewriter property and organized the Remington Standard Typewriter Company, which was eventually succeeded by Remington Rand, Inc. Among all these, Densmore is the one whom Edison had particularly in mind, and the one whom many others have denounced. Indeed, according to one account, the only thing Densmore did for the typewriter was to give Sholes $6,000 for the invention and then turn it over to the Remingtons for a cool million!","PeriodicalId":359130,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Business Historical Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1951-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology and Promotion: The Typewriter\",\"authors\":\"R. N. Current\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0007680500024466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The inventor does the work and the promoter gets the money. That seems to sum up the popular view of the relation between promotion and technology in nineteenth-century America. Take the typewriter as an example. Thomas A. Edison declared in 1921: “Mr. Christopher L. Sholes was the father of the typewriter and got nothing but trouble and neglect in connection with the invention. He fell into the hands of promoters with the usual results.” Who were these promoters? Edison did not name names, but chief among them were in fact the following: James Densmore, George Washington Newton Yost, the firm of E. Remington & Sons, and finally the latter's selling agents—Wyckoff, Seamans, and Benedict—who in 1886 bought the Remingtons' typewriter property and organized the Remington Standard Typewriter Company, which was eventually succeeded by Remington Rand, Inc. Among all these, Densmore is the one whom Edison had particularly in mind, and the one whom many others have denounced. Indeed, according to one account, the only thing Densmore did for the typewriter was to give Sholes $6,000 for the invention and then turn it over to the Remingtons for a cool million!\",\"PeriodicalId\":359130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Business Historical Society\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1951-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Business Historical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680500024466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Business Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680500024466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
发明者做工作,发起人拿钱。这似乎概括了19世纪美国关于晋升与技术之间关系的流行观点。以打字机为例。托马斯·a·爱迪生(Thomas A. Edison)在1921年宣称:“克里斯托弗·l·肖尔斯(Christopher L. Sholes)先生是打字机之父,与这项发明有关的除了麻烦和忽视之外什么都没有。”他落入了推动者的手中,结果和往常一样。”这些发起人是谁?爱迪生没有点名,但其中最主要的是:詹姆斯·登斯莫尔、乔治·华盛顿·牛顿·约斯特、e·雷明顿父子公司,最后是后者的销售代理人威科夫、希曼斯和本尼迪克特,他们在1886年买下了雷明顿的打字机财产,并成立了雷明顿标准打字机公司,最终由雷明顿兰德公司继承。在所有这些人中,爱迪生特别关注的是登斯莫尔,而其他许多人也都谴责过他。事实上,根据一种说法,登斯莫尔为这台打字机所做的唯一一件事就是给肖尔斯6000美元作为这项发明的报酬,然后以整整100万美元的价格把它交给雷明顿夫妇!
The inventor does the work and the promoter gets the money. That seems to sum up the popular view of the relation between promotion and technology in nineteenth-century America. Take the typewriter as an example. Thomas A. Edison declared in 1921: “Mr. Christopher L. Sholes was the father of the typewriter and got nothing but trouble and neglect in connection with the invention. He fell into the hands of promoters with the usual results.” Who were these promoters? Edison did not name names, but chief among them were in fact the following: James Densmore, George Washington Newton Yost, the firm of E. Remington & Sons, and finally the latter's selling agents—Wyckoff, Seamans, and Benedict—who in 1886 bought the Remingtons' typewriter property and organized the Remington Standard Typewriter Company, which was eventually succeeded by Remington Rand, Inc. Among all these, Densmore is the one whom Edison had particularly in mind, and the one whom many others have denounced. Indeed, according to one account, the only thing Densmore did for the typewriter was to give Sholes $6,000 for the invention and then turn it over to the Remingtons for a cool million!