GCC 4.7.1在EISC上的性能评价

Miseon Han, Hokyoon Lee, S. Kim
{"title":"GCC 4.7.1在EISC上的性能评价","authors":"Miseon Han, Hokyoon Lee, S. Kim","doi":"10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an embedded system, power consumption and execution time are important factors in performance. Code quality determines the performance factors, which is greatly influenced by a compiler. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GCC 4.7.1 in comparison of that of GCC 4.2.2 on the EISC architecture with EEMBC in terms of the number of dynamic instructions and compiled code size. The results show that GCC 4.7 reduces 6.8% of the dynamic instructions, but increases 2.9% of code size from GCC 4.2.2.","PeriodicalId":360207,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communications (ICEIC)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of GCC 4.7.1 on EISC\",\"authors\":\"Miseon Han, Hokyoon Lee, S. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an embedded system, power consumption and execution time are important factors in performance. Code quality determines the performance factors, which is greatly influenced by a compiler. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GCC 4.7.1 in comparison of that of GCC 4.2.2 on the EISC architecture with EEMBC in terms of the number of dynamic instructions and compiled code size. The results show that GCC 4.7 reduces 6.8% of the dynamic instructions, but increases 2.9% of code size from GCC 4.2.2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communications (ICEIC)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communications (ICEIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Electronics, Information and Communications (ICEIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在嵌入式系统中,功耗和执行时间是影响性能的重要因素。代码质量决定了性能因素,而这些因素受编译器的影响很大。在本文中,我们从动态指令的数量和编译代码的大小两方面对GCC 4.7.1和GCC 4.2.2在EEMBC架构上的性能进行了比较。结果表明,GCC 4.7减少了6.8%的动态指令,但比GCC 4.2.2增加了2.9%的代码大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of GCC 4.7.1 on EISC
In an embedded system, power consumption and execution time are important factors in performance. Code quality determines the performance factors, which is greatly influenced by a compiler. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GCC 4.7.1 in comparison of that of GCC 4.2.2 on the EISC architecture with EEMBC in terms of the number of dynamic instructions and compiled code size. The results show that GCC 4.7 reduces 6.8% of the dynamic instructions, but increases 2.9% of code size from GCC 4.2.2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信