悲伤的人:埃德加的伪装与丹尼尔的自画像

Hanna Scolnicov
{"title":"悲伤的人:埃德加的伪装与丹尼尔的自画像","authors":"Hanna Scolnicov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In King Lear, Edgar transforms himself from a young aristocrat into the mad beggar, Tom o’Bedlam. Naked except for the blanket that covers his loins, he assumes the image of the Man of Sorrows. He tells Lear that, in his former life, he was a dandy dedicated to cultivating his own looks, spending his time in illicit and multiple sexual relations, in drink and dicing. This is a homiletic picture of himself as a typical courtier, guilty of the deadly sin of vanity. The icon of the Man of Sorrows is familiar from countless paintings, and Shakespeare uses the traditional visual image, lifting it out of its religious context and giving it a Humanist significance. Perhaps the most pertinent visual images are those in which Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528) represented himself as the Man of Sorrows. In his earlier self-portraits, he appears as a handsome young man, well-dressed and carefully coiffed, reminding us of Poor Tom’s account of his past as a frivolous courtier. In her comparative study of Shakespeare and Dürer, Hanna Scolnicov argues that recognizing the surprising images shared by the two helps uncover the conceptual world of the play.","PeriodicalId":136313,"journal":{"name":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Man of Sorrows: Edgar’s Disguise and Dürer’s Self-portraits\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Scolnicov\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In King Lear, Edgar transforms himself from a young aristocrat into the mad beggar, Tom o’Bedlam. Naked except for the blanket that covers his loins, he assumes the image of the Man of Sorrows. He tells Lear that, in his former life, he was a dandy dedicated to cultivating his own looks, spending his time in illicit and multiple sexual relations, in drink and dicing. This is a homiletic picture of himself as a typical courtier, guilty of the deadly sin of vanity. The icon of the Man of Sorrows is familiar from countless paintings, and Shakespeare uses the traditional visual image, lifting it out of its religious context and giving it a Humanist significance. Perhaps the most pertinent visual images are those in which Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528) represented himself as the Man of Sorrows. In his earlier self-portraits, he appears as a handsome young man, well-dressed and carefully coiffed, reminding us of Poor Tom’s account of his past as a frivolous courtier. In her comparative study of Shakespeare and Dürer, Hanna Scolnicov argues that recognizing the surprising images shared by the two helps uncover the conceptual world of the play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Face-to-Face in Shakespearean Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474435680.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《李尔王》中,埃德加把自己从一个年轻的贵族变成了疯狂的乞丐汤姆。除了覆盖腰部的毯子外,他赤身裸体,呈现出悲伤之人的形象。他告诉李尔,在他的前世,他是一个花花公子,致力于培养自己的容貌,把时间花在不正当的和多重性关系上,喝酒和赌博。这是他作为一个典型的朝臣的说教画面,他犯了致命的虚荣罪。悲伤的人的形象在无数的绘画中都是熟悉的,莎士比亚使用了传统的视觉形象,将其从宗教背景中提升出来,赋予其人文主义意义。也许最贴切的视觉形象是阿尔布雷希特·德·雷尔(1471-1528)将自己描绘成悲伤的人。在他早期的自画像中,他看起来是一个英俊的年轻人,穿着得体,精心打理,让我们想起了可怜的汤姆对他过去作为一个轻浮的朝臣的描述。汉娜·斯科尔尼科夫在对莎士比亚和莎士比亚的比较研究中认为,认识到两人共同拥有的令人惊讶的形象有助于揭示戏剧的概念世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Man of Sorrows: Edgar’s Disguise and Dürer’s Self-portraits
In King Lear, Edgar transforms himself from a young aristocrat into the mad beggar, Tom o’Bedlam. Naked except for the blanket that covers his loins, he assumes the image of the Man of Sorrows. He tells Lear that, in his former life, he was a dandy dedicated to cultivating his own looks, spending his time in illicit and multiple sexual relations, in drink and dicing. This is a homiletic picture of himself as a typical courtier, guilty of the deadly sin of vanity. The icon of the Man of Sorrows is familiar from countless paintings, and Shakespeare uses the traditional visual image, lifting it out of its religious context and giving it a Humanist significance. Perhaps the most pertinent visual images are those in which Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528) represented himself as the Man of Sorrows. In his earlier self-portraits, he appears as a handsome young man, well-dressed and carefully coiffed, reminding us of Poor Tom’s account of his past as a frivolous courtier. In her comparative study of Shakespeare and Dürer, Hanna Scolnicov argues that recognizing the surprising images shared by the two helps uncover the conceptual world of the play.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信