{"title":"四家小型软件公司的过程改进","authors":"A. Cater-Steel","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2001.948520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many small software companies, full-scale software. process improvement (SPI) initiatives are often out of reach due to prohibitive costs and lack of SPI knowledge. However, to compete in the global market, software developers must improve their productivity, time to market and customer satisfaction. Software Engineering Australia (Qld) sponsored a process improvement program in which 26 of its member companies participated. A RAPID assessment method, based on SPICE (ISO 15504), was developed and applied. The paper presents findings from the RAPID process improvement program as experienced by four small software companies. For each company, the initial assessment findings are presented, followed by the outcome of the recommendations. The discussion presented compares the capability of the four companies and links the findings from this case study to existing literature related to software process improvement success and failure.","PeriodicalId":360336,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2001 Australian Software Engineering Conference","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process improvement in four small software companies\",\"authors\":\"A. Cater-Steel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASWEC.2001.948520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For many small software companies, full-scale software. process improvement (SPI) initiatives are often out of reach due to prohibitive costs and lack of SPI knowledge. However, to compete in the global market, software developers must improve their productivity, time to market and customer satisfaction. Software Engineering Australia (Qld) sponsored a process improvement program in which 26 of its member companies participated. A RAPID assessment method, based on SPICE (ISO 15504), was developed and applied. The paper presents findings from the RAPID process improvement program as experienced by four small software companies. For each company, the initial assessment findings are presented, followed by the outcome of the recommendations. The discussion presented compares the capability of the four companies and links the findings from this case study to existing literature related to software process improvement success and failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2001 Australian Software Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2001 Australian Software Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2001.948520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2001 Australian Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2001.948520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
摘要
对于许多小型软件公司来说,全尺寸的软件。由于高昂的成本和缺乏SPI知识,过程改进(SPI)计划常常是遥不可及的。然而,为了在全球市场上竞争,软件开发人员必须提高他们的生产力、上市时间和客户满意度。澳大利亚软件工程协会(Qld)发起了一项过程改进计划,有26家成员公司参与其中。基于SPICE (ISO 15504),开发并应用了一种快速评估方法。本文介绍了四家小型软件公司从RAPID过程改进项目中获得的经验。对于每个公司,将介绍初步评估结果,然后是建议的结果。讨论比较了这四家公司的能力,并将本案例研究的发现与现有的与软件过程改进成功和失败相关的文献联系起来。
Process improvement in four small software companies
For many small software companies, full-scale software. process improvement (SPI) initiatives are often out of reach due to prohibitive costs and lack of SPI knowledge. However, to compete in the global market, software developers must improve their productivity, time to market and customer satisfaction. Software Engineering Australia (Qld) sponsored a process improvement program in which 26 of its member companies participated. A RAPID assessment method, based on SPICE (ISO 15504), was developed and applied. The paper presents findings from the RAPID process improvement program as experienced by four small software companies. For each company, the initial assessment findings are presented, followed by the outcome of the recommendations. The discussion presented compares the capability of the four companies and links the findings from this case study to existing literature related to software process improvement success and failure.