Jun Zhou, Xin Liu, Yat-Hei Lam, Chao Wang, Kah-Hyong Chang, Jingjing Lan, M. Je
{"title":"HEPP:一种用于容差超低电压设计的实时误差预测与预防新技术","authors":"Jun Zhou, Xin Liu, Yat-Hei Lam, Chao Wang, Kah-Hyong Chang, Jingjing Lan, M. Je","doi":"10.1109/ASSCC.2013.6690999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new in-situ timing-error prediction and prevention technique named HEPP is proposed for mitigating the impact of PVT variations on ultra-low-voltage digital designs. Compared to the prior techniques including Razor and Canary flip-flop, the proposed technique eliminates the hold-time constraint and is able to deal with errors caused by infrequently activated critical paths and fast dynamic variations. It has low overhead and is applicable to general digital designs. The experimental results of applying the proposed HEPP technique to a FFT processor show 122% performance improvement or 88% energy reduction compared to the conventional worst-case design.","PeriodicalId":296544,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HEPP: A new in-situ timing-error prediction and prevention technique for variation-tolerant ultra-low-voltage designs\",\"authors\":\"Jun Zhou, Xin Liu, Yat-Hei Lam, Chao Wang, Kah-Hyong Chang, Jingjing Lan, M. Je\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASSCC.2013.6690999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new in-situ timing-error prediction and prevention technique named HEPP is proposed for mitigating the impact of PVT variations on ultra-low-voltage digital designs. Compared to the prior techniques including Razor and Canary flip-flop, the proposed technique eliminates the hold-time constraint and is able to deal with errors caused by infrequently activated critical paths and fast dynamic variations. It has low overhead and is applicable to general digital designs. The experimental results of applying the proposed HEPP technique to a FFT processor show 122% performance improvement or 88% energy reduction compared to the conventional worst-case design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASSCC.2013.6690999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASSCC.2013.6690999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
HEPP: A new in-situ timing-error prediction and prevention technique for variation-tolerant ultra-low-voltage designs
A new in-situ timing-error prediction and prevention technique named HEPP is proposed for mitigating the impact of PVT variations on ultra-low-voltage digital designs. Compared to the prior techniques including Razor and Canary flip-flop, the proposed technique eliminates the hold-time constraint and is able to deal with errors caused by infrequently activated critical paths and fast dynamic variations. It has low overhead and is applicable to general digital designs. The experimental results of applying the proposed HEPP technique to a FFT processor show 122% performance improvement or 88% energy reduction compared to the conventional worst-case design.