研究中的自由、原则和责任

F. Hellmann
{"title":"研究中的自由、原则和责任","authors":"F. Hellmann","doi":"10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2023.1.suppl.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this presentation, I address the relationship between the concepts of freedom, principles and responsibility in research and the need to think about the relationship between these three concepts in a social context. Freedom is related to the ability of researchers to develop their research autonomously, choosing their study topics without censorship or coercion. However, such freedom must be problematized its limits, such as, for example, considering respect for human rights. Individual freedom, therefore, has legal and ethical limits, as well as being thought of in terms of collective well-being and the public interest. With regard to the principles, those inherent to the scientific method and those of ethics in research are highlighted. The principles inherent to the scientific method, such as reason and non-contradiction, must be considered in addition to those intrinsic to the specificities of each area of ​​knowledge. Likewise, research ethics presents some principles, among them respect for people, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, as foreseen in North American principialist bioethics. However, these principles can be considered limited in certain social contexts. Therefore, the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights (UBDH) presents at least thirteen principles that can complement the logic of thinking about principles in scientific research in a social context. In turn, responsibility mentions the researcher's obligations in relation to the research carried out. It is the researcher's duty to ensure scientific integrity, not incurring in acts such as plagiarism, falsification or data fabrication. or inventing data, as well as issues related to authorship criteria, following ethical and legal precepts, communicating study results, as well as having social responsibility. It is important to think about the values ​​attached to research and scientific publication today. Does the value of productivity or responsibility prevail? In times of exponential growth of scientific studies and increasing social inequalities, it is fundamental to think about the concepts of freedom, principles and responsibility in the social context research.","PeriodicalId":176982,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Clinical Medicine and Review","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Freedom, Principles and Responsibilities in Research\",\"authors\":\"F. Hellmann\",\"doi\":\"10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2023.1.suppl.1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this presentation, I address the relationship between the concepts of freedom, principles and responsibility in research and the need to think about the relationship between these three concepts in a social context. Freedom is related to the ability of researchers to develop their research autonomously, choosing their study topics without censorship or coercion. However, such freedom must be problematized its limits, such as, for example, considering respect for human rights. Individual freedom, therefore, has legal and ethical limits, as well as being thought of in terms of collective well-being and the public interest. With regard to the principles, those inherent to the scientific method and those of ethics in research are highlighted. The principles inherent to the scientific method, such as reason and non-contradiction, must be considered in addition to those intrinsic to the specificities of each area of ​​knowledge. Likewise, research ethics presents some principles, among them respect for people, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, as foreseen in North American principialist bioethics. However, these principles can be considered limited in certain social contexts. Therefore, the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights (UBDH) presents at least thirteen principles that can complement the logic of thinking about principles in scientific research in a social context. In turn, responsibility mentions the researcher's obligations in relation to the research carried out. It is the researcher's duty to ensure scientific integrity, not incurring in acts such as plagiarism, falsification or data fabrication. or inventing data, as well as issues related to authorship criteria, following ethical and legal precepts, communicating study results, as well as having social responsibility. It is important to think about the values ​​attached to research and scientific publication today. Does the value of productivity or responsibility prevail? In times of exponential growth of scientific studies and increasing social inequalities, it is fundamental to think about the concepts of freedom, principles and responsibility in the social context research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Clinical Medicine and Review\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Clinical Medicine and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2023.1.suppl.1.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Clinical Medicine and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2023.1.suppl.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这次演讲中,我将讨论研究中自由、原则和责任概念之间的关系,以及在社会背景下思考这三个概念之间关系的必要性。自由与研究人员自主开展研究,在不受审查或胁迫的情况下选择研究课题的能力有关。但是,必须对这种自由的限制提出问题,例如,考虑到对人权的尊重。因此,个人自由有法律和道德上的限制,同时也要考虑到集体福利和公共利益。在原则方面,强调了科学方法的内在原则和研究中的伦理原则。除了每个知识领域的特殊性所固有的原则之外,还必须考虑科学方法固有的原则,如理性和非矛盾性。同样,研究伦理学也呈现出一些原则,如北美原则主义生命伦理学所预见的,其中包括尊重人、仁慈、无害和正义。然而,在某些社会背景下,这些原则可能被认为是有限的。因此,《世界生命伦理与人权宣言》(UBDH)提出了至少13条原则,这些原则可以补充社会背景下科学研究中思考原则的逻辑。反过来,责任指的是研究人员与所进行的研究有关的义务。研究人员有责任确保科学诚信,不发生抄袭、伪造或数据伪造等行为。或者发明数据,以及与作者标准有关的问题,遵循道德和法律规范,交流研究结果,以及承担社会责任。今天,重要的是要思考研究和科学出版物的价值。生产力和责任的价值是否占上风?在科学研究呈指数级增长、社会不平等日益加剧的时代,在社会语境研究中思考自由、原则和责任的概念是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Freedom, Principles and Responsibilities in Research
In this presentation, I address the relationship between the concepts of freedom, principles and responsibility in research and the need to think about the relationship between these three concepts in a social context. Freedom is related to the ability of researchers to develop their research autonomously, choosing their study topics without censorship or coercion. However, such freedom must be problematized its limits, such as, for example, considering respect for human rights. Individual freedom, therefore, has legal and ethical limits, as well as being thought of in terms of collective well-being and the public interest. With regard to the principles, those inherent to the scientific method and those of ethics in research are highlighted. The principles inherent to the scientific method, such as reason and non-contradiction, must be considered in addition to those intrinsic to the specificities of each area of ​​knowledge. Likewise, research ethics presents some principles, among them respect for people, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, as foreseen in North American principialist bioethics. However, these principles can be considered limited in certain social contexts. Therefore, the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights (UBDH) presents at least thirteen principles that can complement the logic of thinking about principles in scientific research in a social context. In turn, responsibility mentions the researcher's obligations in relation to the research carried out. It is the researcher's duty to ensure scientific integrity, not incurring in acts such as plagiarism, falsification or data fabrication. or inventing data, as well as issues related to authorship criteria, following ethical and legal precepts, communicating study results, as well as having social responsibility. It is important to think about the values ​​attached to research and scientific publication today. Does the value of productivity or responsibility prevail? In times of exponential growth of scientific studies and increasing social inequalities, it is fundamental to think about the concepts of freedom, principles and responsibility in the social context research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信