Colleen Lucey
{"title":"“Hyenas in Bonnets”","authors":"Colleen Lucey","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501758867.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter contends that the figure of the procuress and madam garnered universal hatred not only among writers but also doctors, sociologists, and abolitionists, who drew upon anti-Semitic rhetoric and fears of “white slavery” to galvanize the public against the go-between and her profession. She was imagined to be a woman more dangerous than the demimondaine, a force harder to contain than the brothel worker, and a villain fiercer than the gold-digging coquette. Indeed, the antagonism toward madams and procuresses was far stronger than that toward other women who defied traditional norms of motherhood. As the chapter demonstrates, at the heart of condemnations of Russia's “hyenas in bonnets” was a deep distrust of women entrepreneurs who acquired social and financial capital. The procuress became a repository for male frustration at women who managed, despite their reproductive irrelevance, to gain a cultural relevancy in their roles as go-betweens.","PeriodicalId":195329,"journal":{"name":"Love for Sale","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Love for Sale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501758867.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章认为,老鸨和夫人的形象不仅在作家中引起了普遍的仇恨,而且在医生、社会学家和废奴主义者中也引起了普遍的仇恨,他们利用反犹言论和对“白奴”的恐惧来激发公众反对中间人和她的职业。她被想象成一个比妓女更危险的女人,一股比妓院工人更难控制的力量,一个比拜金的妖艳女郎更凶狠的恶棍。事实上,对老鸨和老鸨的敌意远比对其他不服从传统母性规范的女性的敌意要强烈得多。正如这一章所表明的,谴责俄罗斯“戴帽子的鬣狗”的核心,是对获得社会和金融资本的女企业家的极度不信任。这个过程变成了男性对女性的挫败感的宝库,尽管她们在生育上无关紧要,但她们在文化上却扮演了中间人的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Hyenas in Bonnets”
This chapter contends that the figure of the procuress and madam garnered universal hatred not only among writers but also doctors, sociologists, and abolitionists, who drew upon anti-Semitic rhetoric and fears of “white slavery” to galvanize the public against the go-between and her profession. She was imagined to be a woman more dangerous than the demimondaine, a force harder to contain than the brothel worker, and a villain fiercer than the gold-digging coquette. Indeed, the antagonism toward madams and procuresses was far stronger than that toward other women who defied traditional norms of motherhood. As the chapter demonstrates, at the heart of condemnations of Russia's “hyenas in bonnets” was a deep distrust of women entrepreneurs who acquired social and financial capital. The procuress became a repository for male frustration at women who managed, despite their reproductive irrelevance, to gain a cultural relevancy in their roles as go-betweens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信