西亚马逊雨林利用的一个世纪:以采掘为基础的热带森林资源保护的教训

O. Coomes
{"title":"西亚马逊雨林利用的一个世纪:以采掘为基础的热带森林资源保护的教训","authors":"O. Coomes","doi":"10.2307/3983515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"W idespread concern over the fate of humid tropical forests has prompted an urgent search for new approaches to rain forest conservation. Of particular interest are extraction-based systems that promise economic benefits to rain forest dwellers while leaving the forest standing. For millennia the rain forest has provided diverse societies throughout the tropical world with a wide range of subsistence, ceremonial, and trade products. Today, conservationists, forest peoples, and researchers look to traditional extractive systems-from wild rubber tapping in Amazonia to rattan gathering in Indonesia-as more appropriate models for the conservation of biotic and cultural diversity. The importance of such alternate models for forest conservation is reflected in the recent creation of extractive reserves, expanded international marketing of rain forest products, pro-extraction policies of conservation groups, and a growing literature on indigenous forest resource use and management.1 An issue of particular relevance to rain forest conservation is the longterm sustainability of extractionbased systems. In the popular mind, native or folk peoples often are seen a living in quiet harmony with the rain forest, harvesting nature's generous and steady bounty for food, fiber, medicine, and, more recently, ash income. Scholars are increasingly revising this view, acknowledging the positive aspects of indigenous resource use practices but pointing to the impacts of traditional peoples since prehistory on the forest landscape, the varied needs and circumstances of indigenous peoples, and contemporary cases of less than sustainable though \"traditional\" resource use.2 Such understanding underscores the need to go beyond vigorous promotion (or criticism) of extractive schemes toward an improved understanding of the specific conditions and circumstances that lead to more, or less, sustainable forest extraction by traditional peoples. A potentially rich source of insight into the sustainability of extractive systems lies in the regional histories of tropical rain forests and peoples. Although a vibrant literature is developing on the environmental history of tropical forests, few works as yet attempt to consider the full range of forest resources used through time in a given region or the complete set of factors that influence resource use both directly and indirectly.3 Studies that examine how forest peoples use their resources today also tend to overlook the historical and geographical context within which such use has arisen, lending a static, even timeless quality to depictions of contemporary extractive activities. Moreover, little attention has been given to the problem of how indigenous extractive systems change through time with varying economic, political, and social conditions. Historical analysis of forest resource use would not only serve to contextualize and enliven descriptive work on","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"91","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Century of Rain Forest Use in Western Amazonia: Lessons for Extraction-Based Conservation of Tropical Forest Resources\",\"authors\":\"O. Coomes\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3983515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"W idespread concern over the fate of humid tropical forests has prompted an urgent search for new approaches to rain forest conservation. Of particular interest are extraction-based systems that promise economic benefits to rain forest dwellers while leaving the forest standing. For millennia the rain forest has provided diverse societies throughout the tropical world with a wide range of subsistence, ceremonial, and trade products. Today, conservationists, forest peoples, and researchers look to traditional extractive systems-from wild rubber tapping in Amazonia to rattan gathering in Indonesia-as more appropriate models for the conservation of biotic and cultural diversity. The importance of such alternate models for forest conservation is reflected in the recent creation of extractive reserves, expanded international marketing of rain forest products, pro-extraction policies of conservation groups, and a growing literature on indigenous forest resource use and management.1 An issue of particular relevance to rain forest conservation is the longterm sustainability of extractionbased systems. In the popular mind, native or folk peoples often are seen a living in quiet harmony with the rain forest, harvesting nature's generous and steady bounty for food, fiber, medicine, and, more recently, ash income. Scholars are increasingly revising this view, acknowledging the positive aspects of indigenous resource use practices but pointing to the impacts of traditional peoples since prehistory on the forest landscape, the varied needs and circumstances of indigenous peoples, and contemporary cases of less than sustainable though \\\"traditional\\\" resource use.2 Such understanding underscores the need to go beyond vigorous promotion (or criticism) of extractive schemes toward an improved understanding of the specific conditions and circumstances that lead to more, or less, sustainable forest extraction by traditional peoples. A potentially rich source of insight into the sustainability of extractive systems lies in the regional histories of tropical rain forests and peoples. Although a vibrant literature is developing on the environmental history of tropical forests, few works as yet attempt to consider the full range of forest resources used through time in a given region or the complete set of factors that influence resource use both directly and indirectly.3 Studies that examine how forest peoples use their resources today also tend to overlook the historical and geographical context within which such use has arisen, lending a static, even timeless quality to depictions of contemporary extractive activities. Moreover, little attention has been given to the problem of how indigenous extractive systems change through time with varying economic, political, and social conditions. Historical analysis of forest resource use would not only serve to contextualize and enliven descriptive work on\",\"PeriodicalId\":425736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest and Conservation History\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"91\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest and Conservation History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

摘要

对潮湿热带森林命运的普遍关注促使人们迫切地寻找保护雨林的新方法。特别令人感兴趣的是基于采掘的系统,它承诺在保留森林的同时给雨林居民带来经济利益。几千年来,雨林为整个热带世界的不同社会提供了各种各样的生存、仪式和贸易产品。今天,自然资源保护主义者、森林居民和研究人员将传统的采伐系统——从亚马逊地区的野生橡胶采伐到印度尼西亚的藤条采伐——视为更适合保护生物和文化多样性的模式。这种替代模式对森林养护的重要性反映在最近建立的采伐保护区、热带雨林产品的国际销售扩大、保护团体支持采伐的政策以及关于土著森林资源利用和管理的文献日益增多与雨林保护特别相关的一个问题是以采掘为基础的系统的长期可持续性。在大众的印象中,土著人或民间居民经常被视为与雨林和谐相处,收获大自然慷慨而稳定的食物、纤维、药物,以及最近的灰烬收入。学者们正在越来越多地修正这一观点,承认土著资源利用实践的积极方面,但指出自史前以来传统民族对森林景观的影响,土著人民的不同需求和情况,以及当代虽然“传统”资源利用但不可持续的情况这种了解强调需要超越对采伐计划的大力促进(或批评),而进一步了解导致传统民族或多或少可持续森林采伐的具体条件和情况。了解采掘系统可持续性的一个潜在的丰富来源是热带雨林和人民的区域历史。2 .虽然关于热带森林环境史的文献正在蓬勃发展,但很少有著作试图考虑到某一地区长期以来所利用的全部森林资源或直接或间接影响资源利用的全部因素审查森林人民今天如何利用其资源的研究也往往忽略了这种利用产生的历史和地理背景,使对当代采伐活动的描述具有静态甚至永恒的性质。此外,很少有人注意到土著采掘系统如何随着时间的推移而随着经济、政治和社会条件的变化而变化。对森林资源利用的历史分析不仅有助于使描述工作具有背景和活力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Century of Rain Forest Use in Western Amazonia: Lessons for Extraction-Based Conservation of Tropical Forest Resources
W idespread concern over the fate of humid tropical forests has prompted an urgent search for new approaches to rain forest conservation. Of particular interest are extraction-based systems that promise economic benefits to rain forest dwellers while leaving the forest standing. For millennia the rain forest has provided diverse societies throughout the tropical world with a wide range of subsistence, ceremonial, and trade products. Today, conservationists, forest peoples, and researchers look to traditional extractive systems-from wild rubber tapping in Amazonia to rattan gathering in Indonesia-as more appropriate models for the conservation of biotic and cultural diversity. The importance of such alternate models for forest conservation is reflected in the recent creation of extractive reserves, expanded international marketing of rain forest products, pro-extraction policies of conservation groups, and a growing literature on indigenous forest resource use and management.1 An issue of particular relevance to rain forest conservation is the longterm sustainability of extractionbased systems. In the popular mind, native or folk peoples often are seen a living in quiet harmony with the rain forest, harvesting nature's generous and steady bounty for food, fiber, medicine, and, more recently, ash income. Scholars are increasingly revising this view, acknowledging the positive aspects of indigenous resource use practices but pointing to the impacts of traditional peoples since prehistory on the forest landscape, the varied needs and circumstances of indigenous peoples, and contemporary cases of less than sustainable though "traditional" resource use.2 Such understanding underscores the need to go beyond vigorous promotion (or criticism) of extractive schemes toward an improved understanding of the specific conditions and circumstances that lead to more, or less, sustainable forest extraction by traditional peoples. A potentially rich source of insight into the sustainability of extractive systems lies in the regional histories of tropical rain forests and peoples. Although a vibrant literature is developing on the environmental history of tropical forests, few works as yet attempt to consider the full range of forest resources used through time in a given region or the complete set of factors that influence resource use both directly and indirectly.3 Studies that examine how forest peoples use their resources today also tend to overlook the historical and geographical context within which such use has arisen, lending a static, even timeless quality to depictions of contemporary extractive activities. Moreover, little attention has been given to the problem of how indigenous extractive systems change through time with varying economic, political, and social conditions. Historical analysis of forest resource use would not only serve to contextualize and enliven descriptive work on
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信