{"title":"空间的象征","authors":"Stephanie Green","doi":"10.4324/9781003124160-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of the term ‘Australian Literature’ in reference to English language literature produced by Australian writers remains, arguably, problematic, not least in terms of its overwriting of a longer and more diverse cultural heritage of First Peoples. Since colonisation, many writers in Australia have contributed significantly to literature, offering regional perspectives on the harsh legacies of British occupation and demonstrating a strong geo-cultural diversity which includes ‘a vigorous renewal’ in Aboriginal culture (Heiss and Minter 2009 13). A selection of literary engagements with the assumptions of colonial occupation are addressed, here. Among the concerns shared by these works is a prevailing sense of anxiety leading to horror, linked with the broader cultural tradition of the Gothic. In some instances, this operates partly in terms of an uncanny confrontation between human and non-human elements, within an overwhelming, indeed sublime, sense of the destructive power of invasive alienation, while, in others, the prevailing sense of threat is more tangibly realised in terms of identity or embodiment. The works referenced here include Elizabeth Jolley’s The Well (1986), Andrew McGahan’s The White Earth (2004), and Julia Leigh The Hunter (1999). The discussion concludes with a reflection on the perspectival shifts offered by Kim Scott ( Benang 1999) and Alexis Wright ( Carpentaria 2006) which foreground the critique of a unified Australian national identity as a shaping literary force.","PeriodicalId":239254,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Companion to Australian Literature","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emblematic Spaces\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Green\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003124160-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of the term ‘Australian Literature’ in reference to English language literature produced by Australian writers remains, arguably, problematic, not least in terms of its overwriting of a longer and more diverse cultural heritage of First Peoples. Since colonisation, many writers in Australia have contributed significantly to literature, offering regional perspectives on the harsh legacies of British occupation and demonstrating a strong geo-cultural diversity which includes ‘a vigorous renewal’ in Aboriginal culture (Heiss and Minter 2009 13). A selection of literary engagements with the assumptions of colonial occupation are addressed, here. Among the concerns shared by these works is a prevailing sense of anxiety leading to horror, linked with the broader cultural tradition of the Gothic. In some instances, this operates partly in terms of an uncanny confrontation between human and non-human elements, within an overwhelming, indeed sublime, sense of the destructive power of invasive alienation, while, in others, the prevailing sense of threat is more tangibly realised in terms of identity or embodiment. The works referenced here include Elizabeth Jolley’s The Well (1986), Andrew McGahan’s The White Earth (2004), and Julia Leigh The Hunter (1999). The discussion concludes with a reflection on the perspectival shifts offered by Kim Scott ( Benang 1999) and Alexis Wright ( Carpentaria 2006) which foreground the critique of a unified Australian national identity as a shaping literary force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Companion to Australian Literature\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Companion to Australian Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003124160-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Companion to Australian Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003124160-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
用“澳大利亚文学”一词来指代澳大利亚作家创作的英语文学作品,可以说,这是有问题的,尤其是就它对第一民族更悠久、更多样化的文化遗产的覆盖而言。自殖民统治以来,澳大利亚的许多作家对文学做出了重大贡献,为英国占领留下的严酷遗产提供了区域性视角,并展示了强大的地缘文化多样性,其中包括土著文化的“蓬勃复兴”(Heiss和Minter 2009年13年)。在这里,我们选择了一些与殖民占领有关的文学作品。这些作品共同关注的是一种导致恐怖的普遍焦虑感,与更广泛的哥特式文化传统有关。在某些情况下,这在某种程度上是人类和非人类元素之间的不可思议的对抗,在一种压倒性的,实际上是崇高的,侵入性异化的破坏性力量的感觉中,而在其他情况下,普遍存在的威胁感在身份或化身方面更具体地实现了。这里引用的作品包括伊丽莎白·乔利的《井》(1986)、安德鲁·麦格汉的《白色土地》(2004)和朱莉娅·利的《猎人》(1999)。讨论的最后是对Kim Scott (Benang 1999)和Alexis Wright (Carpentaria 2006)提出的视角转变的反思,他们将对统一的澳大利亚民族认同的批评作为塑造文学力量的前景。
The use of the term ‘Australian Literature’ in reference to English language literature produced by Australian writers remains, arguably, problematic, not least in terms of its overwriting of a longer and more diverse cultural heritage of First Peoples. Since colonisation, many writers in Australia have contributed significantly to literature, offering regional perspectives on the harsh legacies of British occupation and demonstrating a strong geo-cultural diversity which includes ‘a vigorous renewal’ in Aboriginal culture (Heiss and Minter 2009 13). A selection of literary engagements with the assumptions of colonial occupation are addressed, here. Among the concerns shared by these works is a prevailing sense of anxiety leading to horror, linked with the broader cultural tradition of the Gothic. In some instances, this operates partly in terms of an uncanny confrontation between human and non-human elements, within an overwhelming, indeed sublime, sense of the destructive power of invasive alienation, while, in others, the prevailing sense of threat is more tangibly realised in terms of identity or embodiment. The works referenced here include Elizabeth Jolley’s The Well (1986), Andrew McGahan’s The White Earth (2004), and Julia Leigh The Hunter (1999). The discussion concludes with a reflection on the perspectival shifts offered by Kim Scott ( Benang 1999) and Alexis Wright ( Carpentaria 2006) which foreground the critique of a unified Australian national identity as a shaping literary force.