司法审查和公众询问-程序，案例研究和对(长期)Covid调查的一些意见

Judicial Review Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10854681.2022.2156209

Fiona Barrett

{"title":"司法审查和公众询问-程序，案例研究和对(长期)Covid调查的一些意见","authors":"Fiona Barrett","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2156209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. With reports in the press last month that the ‘UK Covid inquiry bill [is] already at £85 m as government hires top law firms’, a figure arrived at before the public hearings have even commenced, the cost and proper scope of the legal profession’s involvement in what is expected to be the widest-ranging and longest-running statutory inquiry in UK legal history rightly continues to be the source of anxious scrutiny by the media and wider public.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Review and Public Inquiries – Procedure, Case Studies and Some Observations on the (Long) Covid Inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2156209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. With reports in the press last month that the ‘UK Covid inquiry bill [is] already at £85 m as government hires top law firms’, a figure arrived at before the public hearings have even commenced, the cost and proper scope of the legal profession’s involvement in what is expected to be the widest-ranging and longest-running statutory inquiry in UK legal history rightly continues to be the source of anxious scrutiny by the media and wider public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2156209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2156209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 上个月媒体报道称，“英国新冠调查账单已经达到8500万英镑，因为政府聘请了顶级律师事务所”，这个数字甚至在公开听证会开始之前就已经达到了。法律专业人士参与这场预计将是英国法律史上范围最广、持续时间最长的法定调查的成本和适当范围，理所当然地继续成为媒体和广大公众焦虑审查的来源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Judicial Review and Public Inquiries – Procedure, Case Studies and Some Observations on the (Long) Covid Inquiry

1. With reports in the press last month that the ‘UK Covid inquiry bill [is] already at £85 m as government hires top law firms’, a figure arrived at before the public hearings have even commenced, the cost and proper scope of the legal profession’s involvement in what is expected to be the widest-ranging and longest-running statutory inquiry in UK legal history rightly continues to be the source of anxious scrutiny by the media and wider public.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Judicial Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量