{"title":"使用FACET分析定性数据的利弊","authors":"E. Kemp, D. Gray","doi":"10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the FACET approach to analysing qualitative data for the purposes of interface evaluation is described. The reliability and validity issues that arise from basing an interface evaluation on qualitative data are discussed. The practicability of carrying out an interface evaluation using FACET is then considered with particular reference to the cost, time and expertise required.","PeriodicalId":322019,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pros and cons of using FACET for analysing qualitative data\",\"authors\":\"E. Kemp, D. Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the FACET approach to analysing qualitative data for the purposes of interface evaluation is described. The reliability and validity issues that arise from basing an interface evaluation on qualitative data are discussed. The practicability of carrying out an interface evaluation using FACET is then considered with particular reference to the cost, time and expertise required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The pros and cons of using FACET for analysing qualitative data
In this paper, the FACET approach to analysing qualitative data for the purposes of interface evaluation is described. The reliability and validity issues that arise from basing an interface evaluation on qualitative data are discussed. The practicability of carrying out an interface evaluation using FACET is then considered with particular reference to the cost, time and expertise required.