具有网络外部性的协作标准开发和采用

M. Xia, K. Zhao, M. Shaw
{"title":"具有网络外部性的协作标准开发和采用","authors":"M. Xia, K. Zhao, M. Shaw","doi":"10.1109/ICSSSM.2005.1499425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study industry-based collaborative standard development and adoption by firms in a consortium setting, when the standard is open and free. We present a game-theoretical model that recognizes the fact that 1) firm's decision to develop or adopt is endogenous, e.g. firms only participate in the development if doing so dominates being a passive adopter of the standard or not adopting at all; 2) the standard is jointly developed by all participating firms; 3) the standard adoption has network externalities, i.e. the more firms use the standard, the more valuable it is to all adopters; 4) developing firms have insider benefit based on their involvement in the standardization, which results in lower adoption cost. We find that 1) no firm want to be a passive adopter if there is no benefit of waiting in adoption; 2) when the benefit of waiting is lower than a threshold, there are no passive adopters and 3) developing firm's contribution is not a function of the network externalities.","PeriodicalId":389467,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005.","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative standards development and adoption with network externalities\",\"authors\":\"M. Xia, K. Zhao, M. Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSSSM.2005.1499425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study industry-based collaborative standard development and adoption by firms in a consortium setting, when the standard is open and free. We present a game-theoretical model that recognizes the fact that 1) firm's decision to develop or adopt is endogenous, e.g. firms only participate in the development if doing so dominates being a passive adopter of the standard or not adopting at all; 2) the standard is jointly developed by all participating firms; 3) the standard adoption has network externalities, i.e. the more firms use the standard, the more valuable it is to all adopters; 4) developing firms have insider benefit based on their involvement in the standardization, which results in lower adoption cost. We find that 1) no firm want to be a passive adopter if there is no benefit of waiting in adoption; 2) when the benefit of waiting is lower than a threshold, there are no passive adopters and 3) developing firm's contribution is not a function of the network externalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2005.1499425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2005.1499425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究基于行业的协作标准开发和企业在联盟环境下的采用,当标准是开放和免费的。我们提出了一个博弈论模型,该模型承认以下事实:1)企业发展或采用的决策是内生的,例如,企业只有在成为标准的被动采用者或根本不采用标准的情况下才参与开发;2)标准由所有参与企业共同制定;(3)标准采用具有网络外部性,即越多的企业使用该标准,该标准对所有采用者的价值越大;④发展中企业参与标准化具有内部利益,采用成本较低。我们发现,1)如果等待没有好处,没有企业愿意成为被动的采用者;2)当等待收益低于阈值时,不存在被动采用者;3)发展中企业的贡献不是网络外部性的函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative standards development and adoption with network externalities
We study industry-based collaborative standard development and adoption by firms in a consortium setting, when the standard is open and free. We present a game-theoretical model that recognizes the fact that 1) firm's decision to develop or adopt is endogenous, e.g. firms only participate in the development if doing so dominates being a passive adopter of the standard or not adopting at all; 2) the standard is jointly developed by all participating firms; 3) the standard adoption has network externalities, i.e. the more firms use the standard, the more valuable it is to all adopters; 4) developing firms have insider benefit based on their involvement in the standardization, which results in lower adoption cost. We find that 1) no firm want to be a passive adopter if there is no benefit of waiting in adoption; 2) when the benefit of waiting is lower than a threshold, there are no passive adopters and 3) developing firm's contribution is not a function of the network externalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信