2015-2017年中国分级诊断比较分析

Yu-ting Kang, Sheng Li, Liang Du
{"title":"2015-2017年中国分级诊断比较分析","authors":"Yu-ting Kang, Sheng Li, Liang Du","doi":"10.2991/sohe-19.2019.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the implementation of grading diagnosis in Chines \"Health Statistics 2016\" and \"Health Statistics 2018\", in order to understand the implementation of the first stage of grading diagnosis, and provide scientific basis to improve the grading diagnosis in future. Methods: Adopt Descriptive analysis method, with 2015 as the base period and 2017 as the current period, and analyze the implementation of the graded diagnosis at this stage. Results: The number of primary health care institutions, beds, equipment and health personnel increased year by year, but the average annual growth rate was lower than that of hospitals, and the service capacity was much lower than that of hospitals. Conclusion: The overall strength of primary health care institutions is continuously enhanced, and the implementation of the graded diagnosis has certain achievement. However, the utilization efficiency and overall benefits of medical resources are still insufficient. The “soft power” should be enhanced and policy system of health institutions should be further improved.","PeriodicalId":200957,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Health and Education 2019 (SOHE 2019)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Graded Diagnosis(2015-2017) in China\",\"authors\":\"Yu-ting Kang, Sheng Li, Liang Du\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/sohe-19.2019.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the implementation of grading diagnosis in Chines \\\"Health Statistics 2016\\\" and \\\"Health Statistics 2018\\\", in order to understand the implementation of the first stage of grading diagnosis, and provide scientific basis to improve the grading diagnosis in future. Methods: Adopt Descriptive analysis method, with 2015 as the base period and 2017 as the current period, and analyze the implementation of the graded diagnosis at this stage. Results: The number of primary health care institutions, beds, equipment and health personnel increased year by year, but the average annual growth rate was lower than that of hospitals, and the service capacity was much lower than that of hospitals. Conclusion: The overall strength of primary health care institutions is continuously enhanced, and the implementation of the graded diagnosis has certain achievement. However, the utilization efficiency and overall benefits of medical resources are still insufficient. The “soft power” should be enhanced and policy system of health institutions should be further improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Health and Education 2019 (SOHE 2019)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Health and Education 2019 (SOHE 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/sohe-19.2019.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Health and Education 2019 (SOHE 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/sohe-19.2019.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较我国《卫生统计2016》和《卫生统计2018》分级诊断的实施情况,了解第一阶段分级诊断的实施情况,为今后改进分级诊断提供科学依据。方法:采用描述性分析方法,以2015年为基期,2017年为当期,分析该阶段分级诊断的实施情况。结果:基层卫生保健机构、床位、设备和卫生人员数量逐年增加,但年均增长速度低于医院,服务能力远低于医院。结论:基层卫生保健机构综合实力不断增强,分级诊断实施取得一定成效。然而,医疗资源的利用效率和综合效益仍然不足。加强卫生机构“软实力”建设,进一步完善卫生机构政策体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Graded Diagnosis(2015-2017) in China
Objective: To compare the implementation of grading diagnosis in Chines "Health Statistics 2016" and "Health Statistics 2018", in order to understand the implementation of the first stage of grading diagnosis, and provide scientific basis to improve the grading diagnosis in future. Methods: Adopt Descriptive analysis method, with 2015 as the base period and 2017 as the current period, and analyze the implementation of the graded diagnosis at this stage. Results: The number of primary health care institutions, beds, equipment and health personnel increased year by year, but the average annual growth rate was lower than that of hospitals, and the service capacity was much lower than that of hospitals. Conclusion: The overall strength of primary health care institutions is continuously enhanced, and the implementation of the graded diagnosis has certain achievement. However, the utilization efficiency and overall benefits of medical resources are still insufficient. The “soft power” should be enhanced and policy system of health institutions should be further improved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信