柏拉图《会饮篇》中的不明文教导:苏格拉底对ἈριϴμόςἜρως的启蒙

Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE201015229
Burt C. Hopkins
{"title":"柏拉图《会饮篇》中的不明文教导:苏格拉底对ἈριϴμόςἜρως的启蒙","authors":"Burt C. Hopkins","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE201015229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper argues that the ontology of Self behind Descartes's paradigmatic modern account of passion is an obstacle to interpreting properly the account Socrates gives in the Symposium of the truth of Eros's origin, nature, and gift to the philosophical initiate into his truth. The key to interpreting this account is located in the relation between Eros and the arithmos-structure of the community of kinds,which is disclosed in terms of the Symposium's dramatic mimesis of the two Platonic sources of being, the One Itself and the indeterminate dyad. This interpretation's focus is the vulgar and philosophical dimensions of the phallic pun at the beginning of the dialogue. Both dimensions of the dialogue's opening joke manifest the appearance of Eros in the dialogue as a distorted imitation of the koirtonia of the greatest kinds: Being, Rest, Motion, the Same, and the Other.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unwritten Teachings in Plato’s Symposium: Socrates’ Initiation into the Ἀριϴμός of Ἔρως\",\"authors\":\"Burt C. Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE201015229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper argues that the ontology of Self behind Descartes's paradigmatic modern account of passion is an obstacle to interpreting properly the account Socrates gives in the Symposium of the truth of Eros's origin, nature, and gift to the philosophical initiate into his truth. The key to interpreting this account is located in the relation between Eros and the arithmos-structure of the community of kinds,which is disclosed in terms of the Symposium's dramatic mimesis of the two Platonic sources of being, the One Itself and the indeterminate dyad. This interpretation's focus is the vulgar and philosophical dimensions of the phallic pun at the beginning of the dialogue. Both dimensions of the dialogue's opening joke manifest the appearance of Eros in the dialogue as a distorted imitation of the koirtonia of the greatest kinds: Being, Rest, Motion, the Same, and the Other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"233 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,笛卡尔关于激情的范式现代描述背后的自我本体论,是对苏格拉底在《会饮篇》中关于爱神的起源、性质和对他的真理的哲学启蒙的礼物的正确解释的障碍。解读这一描述的关键在于厄洛斯与族类共同体的算术结构之间的关系,这一关系在《会饮篇》对柏拉图式的两种存在来源——一自身和不确定的二分体——的戏剧性模仿中得以揭示。这种解释的重点是对话开始时阳具双关语的庸俗和哲学维度。对话开头笑话的两个维度都显示了厄洛斯在对话中的出现,是对最伟大类型的柯尔托尼亚的扭曲模仿:存在,休息,运动,相同和他者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Unwritten Teachings in Plato’s Symposium: Socrates’ Initiation into the Ἀριϴμός of Ἔρως
The paper argues that the ontology of Self behind Descartes's paradigmatic modern account of passion is an obstacle to interpreting properly the account Socrates gives in the Symposium of the truth of Eros's origin, nature, and gift to the philosophical initiate into his truth. The key to interpreting this account is located in the relation between Eros and the arithmos-structure of the community of kinds,which is disclosed in terms of the Symposium's dramatic mimesis of the two Platonic sources of being, the One Itself and the indeterminate dyad. This interpretation's focus is the vulgar and philosophical dimensions of the phallic pun at the beginning of the dialogue. Both dimensions of the dialogue's opening joke manifest the appearance of Eros in the dialogue as a distorted imitation of the koirtonia of the greatest kinds: Being, Rest, Motion, the Same, and the Other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信