“最终状态”投资组合的资产配置

Michelle Teng, Junying Shen
{"title":"“最终状态”投资组合的资产配置","authors":"Michelle Teng, Junying Shen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3728657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years many US corporate pension plans have closed and entered their “end-state.” As end-state plans have become more prevalent, their special portfolio management challenges, including asset allocation, have gained attention. Pure immunization with public fixed income assets (“hibernation”) is a possible investment management strategy to try to minimize funding ratio variability. But this may not be sufficient for all end-state plans. For example, mortality risk could cause the actual cash liabilities to deviate from the estimated cash liabilities. This risk may argue for the inclusion of return-seeking assets. In addition, some plans have had good performance experience with their illiquid private assets (e.g., private real estate, private equity, and private credit funds). How can a CIO evaluate the potential of these private assets remaining in their end-state portfolio? We use our asset allocation framework (OASIS™) to help end-state investors solve for optimal asset allocations. An asset allocation solution seeks to maximize the end-state portfolio’s expected horizon value while meeting future cash obligations at a desired confidence level and keeping the funded status at a target level of stability over the investment horizon. We show that private assets can play an important role in helping end-state portfolios achieve their return objectives while meeting their liquidity and funded status stability constraints. CIOs managing end-state portfolios may impose additional constraints to address their specific concerns. For example, CIOs may impose an upper limit on their total allocation to private assets, impose a floor on the plan’s funding ratio, or express views on expected private asset performance and their fund-selection skills. Making asset allocation constraints more restrictive typically implies a less risky portfolio, with a lower allocation to private assets. The OASIS framework helps CIOs measure this tradeoff between performance and their constraints, allowing them to make better business decisions.","PeriodicalId":224430,"journal":{"name":"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asset Allocation for “End-State” Portfolios\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Teng, Junying Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3728657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years many US corporate pension plans have closed and entered their “end-state.” As end-state plans have become more prevalent, their special portfolio management challenges, including asset allocation, have gained attention. Pure immunization with public fixed income assets (“hibernation”) is a possible investment management strategy to try to minimize funding ratio variability. But this may not be sufficient for all end-state plans. For example, mortality risk could cause the actual cash liabilities to deviate from the estimated cash liabilities. This risk may argue for the inclusion of return-seeking assets. In addition, some plans have had good performance experience with their illiquid private assets (e.g., private real estate, private equity, and private credit funds). How can a CIO evaluate the potential of these private assets remaining in their end-state portfolio? We use our asset allocation framework (OASIS™) to help end-state investors solve for optimal asset allocations. An asset allocation solution seeks to maximize the end-state portfolio’s expected horizon value while meeting future cash obligations at a desired confidence level and keeping the funded status at a target level of stability over the investment horizon. We show that private assets can play an important role in helping end-state portfolios achieve their return objectives while meeting their liquidity and funded status stability constraints. CIOs managing end-state portfolios may impose additional constraints to address their specific concerns. For example, CIOs may impose an upper limit on their total allocation to private assets, impose a floor on the plan’s funding ratio, or express views on expected private asset performance and their fund-selection skills. Making asset allocation constraints more restrictive typically implies a less risky portfolio, with a lower allocation to private assets. The OASIS framework helps CIOs measure this tradeoff between performance and their constraints, allowing them to make better business decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision-Making in Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,许多美国企业的养老金计划已经关闭,进入了“终极状态”。随着最终状态计划变得越来越普遍,其特殊的投资组合管理挑战(包括资产配置)已引起人们的关注。纯免疫公共固定收益资产(“冬眠”)是一种可能的投资管理策略,以尽量减少资金比率的变化。但这可能并不足以适用于所有最终国家计划。例如,死亡风险可能导致实际现金负债偏离估计现金负债。这种风险可能会促使投资者将寻求回报的资产纳入其中。此外,一些计划在其非流动性私人资产(例如,私人房地产、私人股本和私人信贷基金)方面有良好的业绩经验。首席信息官如何评估这些留在其最终状态投资组合中的私人资产的潜力?我们使用我们的资产配置框架(OASIS™)来帮助终端投资者解决最佳资产配置问题。资产配置解决方案寻求最大化最终状态投资组合的预期范围价值,同时在期望的置信度水平上满足未来的现金义务,并在投资范围内将资金状态保持在目标稳定水平。我们的研究表明,私人资产在帮助最终状态投资组合实现其回报目标,同时满足其流动性和资金状况稳定性约束方面可以发挥重要作用。管理最终状态投资组合的首席信息官可能会施加额外的约束来解决他们的具体问题。例如,首席信息官可以对私人资产的总配置设定上限,对计划的资金比例设定下限,或者对预期的私人资产表现和他们的基金选择技巧发表意见。使资产配置约束更严格通常意味着投资组合风险更低,对私人资产的配置更少。OASIS框架帮助首席信息官衡量性能和约束之间的权衡,使他们能够做出更好的业务决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asset Allocation for “End-State” Portfolios
In recent years many US corporate pension plans have closed and entered their “end-state.” As end-state plans have become more prevalent, their special portfolio management challenges, including asset allocation, have gained attention. Pure immunization with public fixed income assets (“hibernation”) is a possible investment management strategy to try to minimize funding ratio variability. But this may not be sufficient for all end-state plans. For example, mortality risk could cause the actual cash liabilities to deviate from the estimated cash liabilities. This risk may argue for the inclusion of return-seeking assets. In addition, some plans have had good performance experience with their illiquid private assets (e.g., private real estate, private equity, and private credit funds). How can a CIO evaluate the potential of these private assets remaining in their end-state portfolio? We use our asset allocation framework (OASIS™) to help end-state investors solve for optimal asset allocations. An asset allocation solution seeks to maximize the end-state portfolio’s expected horizon value while meeting future cash obligations at a desired confidence level and keeping the funded status at a target level of stability over the investment horizon. We show that private assets can play an important role in helping end-state portfolios achieve their return objectives while meeting their liquidity and funded status stability constraints. CIOs managing end-state portfolios may impose additional constraints to address their specific concerns. For example, CIOs may impose an upper limit on their total allocation to private assets, impose a floor on the plan’s funding ratio, or express views on expected private asset performance and their fund-selection skills. Making asset allocation constraints more restrictive typically implies a less risky portfolio, with a lower allocation to private assets. The OASIS framework helps CIOs measure this tradeoff between performance and their constraints, allowing them to make better business decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信