软件系统可靠性和其他性能度量的马尔可夫模型*

A. Goel, K. Okumoto
{"title":"软件系统可靠性和其他性能度量的马尔可夫模型*","authors":"A. Goel, K. Okumoto","doi":"10.1109/MARK.1979.8817248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have been undertaken in recent years to investigate the software failure phenomenon, with the objective of developing analytical models for quantitative assessment of software performance. Most of these studies assume that the times between software failures follow an exponential distribution with a failure rate that depends on the number of errors in the system (see, for example, Jelinski and Moranda, 5 Littlewood and Verrall 6 and Shooman 11 ). A key assumption made in most of these studies is that the errors are removed with certainty when detected. However, as pointed out in Miyamoto 7 and Thayer et al., 12 errors are not always corrected when detected. The existing models do not provide a solution for such situations.","PeriodicalId":341008,"journal":{"name":"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Markovian model for reliability and other performance measures of software systems*\",\"authors\":\"A. Goel, K. Okumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MARK.1979.8817248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several studies have been undertaken in recent years to investigate the software failure phenomenon, with the objective of developing analytical models for quantitative assessment of software performance. Most of these studies assume that the times between software failures follow an exponential distribution with a failure rate that depends on the number of errors in the system (see, for example, Jelinski and Moranda, 5 Littlewood and Verrall 6 and Shooman 11 ). A key assumption made in most of these studies is that the errors are removed with certainty when detected. However, as pointed out in Miyamoto 7 and Thayer et al., 12 errors are not always corrected when detected. The existing models do not provide a solution for such situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.1979.8817248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.1979.8817248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

近年来进行了一些研究来调查软件故障现象,目的是开发用于定量评估软件性能的分析模型。这些研究大多假设软件故障之间的时间遵循指数分布,其故障率取决于系统中的错误数量(例如,参见Jelinski和Moranda, Littlewood和Verrall 6和Shooman 11)。这些研究中的一个关键假设是,当检测到错误时,错误肯定会被消除。然而,正如Miyamoto 7和Thayer等人所指出的,12个错误在被发现后并不总是被纠正。现有的模型不能为这种情况提供解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Markovian model for reliability and other performance measures of software systems*
Several studies have been undertaken in recent years to investigate the software failure phenomenon, with the objective of developing analytical models for quantitative assessment of software performance. Most of these studies assume that the times between software failures follow an exponential distribution with a failure rate that depends on the number of errors in the system (see, for example, Jelinski and Moranda, 5 Littlewood and Verrall 6 and Shooman 11 ). A key assumption made in most of these studies is that the errors are removed with certainty when detected. However, as pointed out in Miyamoto 7 and Thayer et al., 12 errors are not always corrected when detected. The existing models do not provide a solution for such situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信