导致教育语言结巴的研究思路:种姓神话下的差异研究性教学

Ester Maria Dreher Heuser
{"title":"导致教育语言结巴的研究思路:种姓神话下的差异研究性教学","authors":"Ester Maria Dreher Heuser","doi":"10.1590/2175-6236124423vs02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article deals with the first condition for the creation and updating of the idea of research-teaching of difference invented by Sandra Corazza, with which she rebelled against the national consensus that research is carried out in post-graduate studies – genesis of the myth that divides education into two castes: on the one hand, there are the rare intellectuals who research and, on the other, there is a large mass of professors who only teach. It defends, presents and exemplifies that the invention of the idea of research-teaching had as a condition a specific relationship with the pedagogical language: making it stutter by inserting in it the schizo-writing procedure, whose result was the production of dissonant effects to the consensus and the expansion of the language borders.","PeriodicalId":273710,"journal":{"name":"Educação & Realidade","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Research Idea that makes the Educational Language Stutter: research-teaching of difference against the myth of castes\",\"authors\":\"Ester Maria Dreher Heuser\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2175-6236124423vs02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article deals with the first condition for the creation and updating of the idea of research-teaching of difference invented by Sandra Corazza, with which she rebelled against the national consensus that research is carried out in post-graduate studies – genesis of the myth that divides education into two castes: on the one hand, there are the rare intellectuals who research and, on the other, there is a large mass of professors who only teach. It defends, presents and exemplifies that the invention of the idea of research-teaching had as a condition a specific relationship with the pedagogical language: making it stutter by inserting in it the schizo-writing procedure, whose result was the production of dissonant effects to the consensus and the expansion of the language borders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educação & Realidade\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educação & Realidade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236124423vs02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educação & Realidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236124423vs02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了桑德拉·科拉扎(Sandra Corazza)提出的“研究性差异教学”(research-teaching of difference)理念的产生和更新的首要条件,她用这一理念反抗了“研究只能在研究生阶段进行”的全国共识——将教育划分为两个阶层的神话的起源:一方面是极少数的知识分子从事研究,另一方面是大量的教授只从事教学。它捍卫、呈现并例证了研究性教学理念的发明作为一种条件,与教学语言有一种特殊的关系:通过在教学语言中插入分裂写作程序,使其口吃,其结果是对共识产生不和谐的影响,并扩大了语言边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Research Idea that makes the Educational Language Stutter: research-teaching of difference against the myth of castes
ABSTRACT The article deals with the first condition for the creation and updating of the idea of research-teaching of difference invented by Sandra Corazza, with which she rebelled against the national consensus that research is carried out in post-graduate studies – genesis of the myth that divides education into two castes: on the one hand, there are the rare intellectuals who research and, on the other, there is a large mass of professors who only teach. It defends, presents and exemplifies that the invention of the idea of research-teaching had as a condition a specific relationship with the pedagogical language: making it stutter by inserting in it the schizo-writing procedure, whose result was the production of dissonant effects to the consensus and the expansion of the language borders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信