有效决策的前因:一种认知方法

Allard C. R. van Riel, H. Ouwersloot, J. Lemmink
{"title":"有效决策的前因:一种认知方法","authors":"Allard C. R. van Riel, H. Ouwersloot, J. Lemmink","doi":"10.26481/umamet.2003026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiviness of decision-making has been associated with how well managers adapt their cognitive style to task requirements. In this paper, theories regarding decision-making under uncertainty, and the use of judgment and intuition are reviewed and integrated. The Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT), positing a one-dimensional continuum of cognitive styles anchored by intuition and analysis, is extended: Four fundamental decision styles are identified and evaluated for their relative effectiveness under various task conditions. Propositions are developed with respect to the relationships between decision task characteristics and the likelihood of using two cognitive systems, with respect to potential moderators of decision-making effectiveness. The propositions are integrated into a comprehensive theoretical model. The major contributions of the study are a conceptual clarification of the distinctions between intuition, heuristics and bounded rationality, and the assessment of the scope of various cognitive styles as well as the identification of moderators of their effectiveness. Research implications and some suggestions for managerial practice are also provided.","PeriodicalId":175771,"journal":{"name":"The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedents of Effective Decision Making: A Cognitive Approach\",\"authors\":\"Allard C. R. van Riel, H. Ouwersloot, J. Lemmink\",\"doi\":\"10.26481/umamet.2003026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effectiviness of decision-making has been associated with how well managers adapt their cognitive style to task requirements. In this paper, theories regarding decision-making under uncertainty, and the use of judgment and intuition are reviewed and integrated. The Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT), positing a one-dimensional continuum of cognitive styles anchored by intuition and analysis, is extended: Four fundamental decision styles are identified and evaluated for their relative effectiveness under various task conditions. Propositions are developed with respect to the relationships between decision task characteristics and the likelihood of using two cognitive systems, with respect to potential moderators of decision-making effectiveness. The propositions are integrated into a comprehensive theoretical model. The major contributions of the study are a conceptual clarification of the distinctions between intuition, heuristics and bounded rationality, and the assessment of the scope of various cognitive styles as well as the identification of moderators of their effectiveness. Research implications and some suggestions for managerial practice are also provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26481/umamet.2003026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26481/umamet.2003026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

决策的有效性与管理者如何调整他们的认知风格以适应任务要求有关。本文对不确定性下的决策理论、判断和直觉的运用进行了回顾和整合。认知连续体理论(CCT),假设一个以直觉和分析为基础的认知风格的一维连续体,被扩展:四种基本决策风格被识别和评估在不同任务条件下的相对有效性。命题是关于决策任务特征和使用两种认知系统的可能性之间的关系,以及决策有效性的潜在调节因素。这些命题被整合成一个全面的理论模型。该研究的主要贡献是在概念上澄清了直觉、启发式和有限理性之间的区别,评估了各种认知风格的范围,并确定了其有效性的调节者。并提出了研究启示和管理实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antecedents of Effective Decision Making: A Cognitive Approach
The effectiviness of decision-making has been associated with how well managers adapt their cognitive style to task requirements. In this paper, theories regarding decision-making under uncertainty, and the use of judgment and intuition are reviewed and integrated. The Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT), positing a one-dimensional continuum of cognitive styles anchored by intuition and analysis, is extended: Four fundamental decision styles are identified and evaluated for their relative effectiveness under various task conditions. Propositions are developed with respect to the relationships between decision task characteristics and the likelihood of using two cognitive systems, with respect to potential moderators of decision-making effectiveness. The propositions are integrated into a comprehensive theoretical model. The major contributions of the study are a conceptual clarification of the distinctions between intuition, heuristics and bounded rationality, and the assessment of the scope of various cognitive styles as well as the identification of moderators of their effectiveness. Research implications and some suggestions for managerial practice are also provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信