P. Beame, R. Impagliazzo, T. Pitassi, Nathan Segerlind
{"title":"记忆和DPLL:公式缓存证明系统","authors":"P. Beame, R. Impagliazzo, T. Pitassi, Nathan Segerlind","doi":"10.1109/CCC.2003.1214425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fruitful connection between algorithm design and proof complexity is the formalization of the DPLL approach to satisfiability testing in terms of tree-like resolution proofs. We consider extensions of the DPLL approach that add some version of memoization, remembering formulas the algorithm has previously shown unsatisfiable. Various versions of such formula caching algorithms have been suggested for satisfiability and stochastic satisfiability (S. M. Majercik et al., 1998; F. Bacchus et al., 2003). We formalize this method, and characterize the strength of various versions in terms of proof systems. These proof systems seem to be both new and simple, and have a rich structure. We compare their strength to several studied proof systems: tree-like resolution, regular resolution, general resolution, and Res(k). We give both simulations and separations.","PeriodicalId":286846,"journal":{"name":"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memoization and DPLL: formula caching proof systems\",\"authors\":\"P. Beame, R. Impagliazzo, T. Pitassi, Nathan Segerlind\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCC.2003.1214425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fruitful connection between algorithm design and proof complexity is the formalization of the DPLL approach to satisfiability testing in terms of tree-like resolution proofs. We consider extensions of the DPLL approach that add some version of memoization, remembering formulas the algorithm has previously shown unsatisfiable. Various versions of such formula caching algorithms have been suggested for satisfiability and stochastic satisfiability (S. M. Majercik et al., 1998; F. Bacchus et al., 2003). We formalize this method, and characterize the strength of various versions in terms of proof systems. These proof systems seem to be both new and simple, and have a rich structure. We compare their strength to several studied proof systems: tree-like resolution, regular resolution, general resolution, and Res(k). We give both simulations and separations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2003.1214425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2003.1214425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
摘要
算法设计和证明复杂性之间的一个富有成效的联系是将DPLL方法形式化,以树状分辨率证明的形式进行可满足性测试。我们考虑了DPLL方法的扩展,增加了一些版本的记忆,记住了算法以前显示的不满意的公式。对于可满足性和随机可满足性,已经提出了这种公式缓存算法的各种版本(S. M. Majercik等人,1998;F. Bacchus et al., 2003)。我们将这种方法形式化,并根据证明系统描述了各种版本的强度。这些证明系统似乎既新颖又简单,结构丰富。我们将它们的强度与几个研究过的证明系统进行了比较:树状分辨率、常规分辨率、一般分辨率和Res(k)。我们给出了模拟和分离。
Memoization and DPLL: formula caching proof systems
A fruitful connection between algorithm design and proof complexity is the formalization of the DPLL approach to satisfiability testing in terms of tree-like resolution proofs. We consider extensions of the DPLL approach that add some version of memoization, remembering formulas the algorithm has previously shown unsatisfiable. Various versions of such formula caching algorithms have been suggested for satisfiability and stochastic satisfiability (S. M. Majercik et al., 1998; F. Bacchus et al., 2003). We formalize this method, and characterize the strength of various versions in terms of proof systems. These proof systems seem to be both new and simple, and have a rich structure. We compare their strength to several studied proof systems: tree-like resolution, regular resolution, general resolution, and Res(k). We give both simulations and separations.