调解作为解决争议的另一种方法:法律规制中的国际和国家实践

M. Deineha
{"title":"调解作为解决争议的另一种方法:法律规制中的国际和国家实践","authors":"M. Deineha","doi":"10.31548/law2022.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the subject under study is conditioned upon the fact that the strengthening of Ukraine’s European integration requires the introduction of new, alternative methods of dispute resolution in national legislation and practice, among which mediation occupies a prominent place, the functioning of which has successfully proven itself in developed European countries. The purpose of this study was to figure out the current state of development of legal support for mediation in Ukraine, to outline prospects for improving legal regulation, considering International and European standards of mediation. The study used a system of general scientific methods of cognition (dialectical method, formal logical method, method of analysis and synthesis), as well as special legal methods (comparative legal method, formal legal method). The authors analysed the international and national practices of legal regulation of mediation in the system of alternative dispute resolution methods. Doctrinal and legislative approaches to the interpretation of the mediation were described, its main advantages in the system of alternative dispute resolution methods were found, types of mediation were outlined, and the content of the main international, European, and Ukrainian regulations governing relations in mediation were covered. It was found that mediation occupies a priority position in the international practices of conflict resolution, since it is much more effective than judicial and administrative forms of protection of rights and legitimate interests. It was proved that the attractiveness of mediation lies precisely in the simplicity and convenience of the procedure, a calm atmosphere of dialogue and the obligation to consider the opinions of all involved parties. It was found that this legal institution is based on voluntariness, confidentiality, impartiality, and neutrality, the possibility for participants to make their own decisions, and the presence of independent support of each participant from the mediator. It was noted that, despite the national legal framework for mediation developed in Ukraine, the outlined sphere of public relations requires improvement of the relevant legal mechanism and the institutional basis for its implementation. The results obtained can be used in further studies, as well as in the development of new and changing the existing regulations that determine the legal basis of mediation in the practice of implementing relevant legislation.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediation as an alternative method of dispute resolution: International and national practices in legal regulation\",\"authors\":\"M. Deineha\",\"doi\":\"10.31548/law2022.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the subject under study is conditioned upon the fact that the strengthening of Ukraine’s European integration requires the introduction of new, alternative methods of dispute resolution in national legislation and practice, among which mediation occupies a prominent place, the functioning of which has successfully proven itself in developed European countries. The purpose of this study was to figure out the current state of development of legal support for mediation in Ukraine, to outline prospects for improving legal regulation, considering International and European standards of mediation. The study used a system of general scientific methods of cognition (dialectical method, formal logical method, method of analysis and synthesis), as well as special legal methods (comparative legal method, formal legal method). The authors analysed the international and national practices of legal regulation of mediation in the system of alternative dispute resolution methods. Doctrinal and legislative approaches to the interpretation of the mediation were described, its main advantages in the system of alternative dispute resolution methods were found, types of mediation were outlined, and the content of the main international, European, and Ukrainian regulations governing relations in mediation were covered. It was found that mediation occupies a priority position in the international practices of conflict resolution, since it is much more effective than judicial and administrative forms of protection of rights and legitimate interests. It was proved that the attractiveness of mediation lies precisely in the simplicity and convenience of the procedure, a calm atmosphere of dialogue and the obligation to consider the opinions of all involved parties. It was found that this legal institution is based on voluntariness, confidentiality, impartiality, and neutrality, the possibility for participants to make their own decisions, and the presence of independent support of each participant from the mediator. It was noted that, despite the national legal framework for mediation developed in Ukraine, the outlined sphere of public relations requires improvement of the relevant legal mechanism and the institutional basis for its implementation. The results obtained can be used in further studies, as well as in the development of new and changing the existing regulations that determine the legal basis of mediation in the practice of implementing relevant legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law. Human. Environment\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law. Human. Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2022.04.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2022.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所研究的主题的相关性取决于这样一个事实,即加强乌克兰的欧洲一体化需要在国家立法和实践中采用新的替代性争端解决方法,其中调解占有突出地位,其功能已在欧洲发达国家成功地证明了自己。本研究的目的是了解乌克兰调解法律支持的发展现状,并在考虑国际和欧洲调解标准的情况下,概述改善法律监管的前景。本研究运用了一般科学的认知方法(辩证法、形式逻辑方法、分析综合方法)和特殊的法律方法(比较法、形式法律方法)。作者分析了国际上和国内在替代性纠纷解决方式制度中调解法律规制的实践。本文描述了解释调解的理论和立法途径,发现了调解在替代性争议解决方法系统中的主要优势,概述了调解的类型,并涵盖了调解关系的主要国际、欧洲和乌克兰法规的内容。人们发现,调解在解决冲突的国际实践中占有优先地位,因为它比保护权利和合法利益的司法和行政形式有效得多。事实证明,调解的吸引力恰恰在于程序的简单和便利、对话的平静气氛以及有义务考虑所有有关各方的意见。研究发现,这种法律制度的基础是自愿、保密、公正和中立,参与者有可能做出自己的决定,每个参与者都有来自调解员的独立支持。有人指出,尽管乌克兰制定了调解的国家法律框架,但概述的公共关系领域需要改进有关的法律机制及其执行的体制基础。所得的结果可用于进一步的研究,也可用于制定新的和修改现行法规,以确定在执行有关立法的实践中调解的法律依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mediation as an alternative method of dispute resolution: International and national practices in legal regulation
The relevance of the subject under study is conditioned upon the fact that the strengthening of Ukraine’s European integration requires the introduction of new, alternative methods of dispute resolution in national legislation and practice, among which mediation occupies a prominent place, the functioning of which has successfully proven itself in developed European countries. The purpose of this study was to figure out the current state of development of legal support for mediation in Ukraine, to outline prospects for improving legal regulation, considering International and European standards of mediation. The study used a system of general scientific methods of cognition (dialectical method, formal logical method, method of analysis and synthesis), as well as special legal methods (comparative legal method, formal legal method). The authors analysed the international and national practices of legal regulation of mediation in the system of alternative dispute resolution methods. Doctrinal and legislative approaches to the interpretation of the mediation were described, its main advantages in the system of alternative dispute resolution methods were found, types of mediation were outlined, and the content of the main international, European, and Ukrainian regulations governing relations in mediation were covered. It was found that mediation occupies a priority position in the international practices of conflict resolution, since it is much more effective than judicial and administrative forms of protection of rights and legitimate interests. It was proved that the attractiveness of mediation lies precisely in the simplicity and convenience of the procedure, a calm atmosphere of dialogue and the obligation to consider the opinions of all involved parties. It was found that this legal institution is based on voluntariness, confidentiality, impartiality, and neutrality, the possibility for participants to make their own decisions, and the presence of independent support of each participant from the mediator. It was noted that, despite the national legal framework for mediation developed in Ukraine, the outlined sphere of public relations requires improvement of the relevant legal mechanism and the institutional basis for its implementation. The results obtained can be used in further studies, as well as in the development of new and changing the existing regulations that determine the legal basis of mediation in the practice of implementing relevant legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信