远期汇率效率:协整与误差修正模型方法

Moses Azege
{"title":"远期汇率效率:协整与误差修正模型方法","authors":"Moses Azege","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1773212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forward rate unbiased hypothesis (FRUH) often generates mixed result in literatures. However, sophistication in econometric techniques has questioned the validity of traditional test for FRUH over the years. Consequently, this dissertation shows that exchange rates have unit root and are cointegrated with parameter near unity. Therefore, this makes regressing the level spot rate on the forward rate inappropriate. Furthermore, the forward premium regression becomes incomplete. Thus, an error correction model is proposed as a more suitable specification to test for FRUH. The results obtained did not provide support for FRUH. Additionally, evidence is shown that the forward premium puzzle has abated overtime and is subsample specific.","PeriodicalId":151990,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Foreign Exchange Models (Topic)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forward Exchange Rate Efficiency: A Cointegration and Error Correction Model Approach\",\"authors\":\"Moses Azege\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1773212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forward rate unbiased hypothesis (FRUH) often generates mixed result in literatures. However, sophistication in econometric techniques has questioned the validity of traditional test for FRUH over the years. Consequently, this dissertation shows that exchange rates have unit root and are cointegrated with parameter near unity. Therefore, this makes regressing the level spot rate on the forward rate inappropriate. Furthermore, the forward premium regression becomes incomplete. Thus, an error correction model is proposed as a more suitable specification to test for FRUH. The results obtained did not provide support for FRUH. Additionally, evidence is shown that the forward premium puzzle has abated overtime and is subsample specific.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Foreign Exchange Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Foreign Exchange Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1773212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Foreign Exchange Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1773212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在文献中,远期利率无偏假设(FRUH)经常产生混杂的结果。然而,多年来,计量经济学技术的成熟质疑了传统检验FRUH的有效性。因此,本文证明了汇率具有单位根并与参数近单位协整。因此,这使得将即期汇率水平回归到远期汇率上是不合适的。进一步,远期溢价回归变得不完全。因此,提出了一种误差修正模型作为更合适的规范来测试FRUH。所得结果不支持FRUH。此外,有证据表明,远期溢价之谜随着时间的推移而减弱,并且是子样本特异性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forward Exchange Rate Efficiency: A Cointegration and Error Correction Model Approach
Forward rate unbiased hypothesis (FRUH) often generates mixed result in literatures. However, sophistication in econometric techniques has questioned the validity of traditional test for FRUH over the years. Consequently, this dissertation shows that exchange rates have unit root and are cointegrated with parameter near unity. Therefore, this makes regressing the level spot rate on the forward rate inappropriate. Furthermore, the forward premium regression becomes incomplete. Thus, an error correction model is proposed as a more suitable specification to test for FRUH. The results obtained did not provide support for FRUH. Additionally, evidence is shown that the forward premium puzzle has abated overtime and is subsample specific.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信