利用薄伪影去除方法改善皮肤镜图像中皮肤病变的分割

Tomás Majtner, Kristína Lidayová, Sule YAYILGAN YILDIRIM, J. Hardeberg
{"title":"利用薄伪影去除方法改善皮肤镜图像中皮肤病变的分割","authors":"Tomás Majtner, Kristína Lidayová, Sule YAYILGAN YILDIRIM, J. Hardeberg","doi":"10.1109/EUVIP.2016.7764580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In dermoscopic images, various thin artefacts naturally appear, most usually in the form of hairs. While trying to find the border of the skin lesion, these artefacts effect the lesion segmentation methods and also the subsequent classification. Currently, there is a lot of research focus in this area and various methods are presented both for skin lesion segmentation and thin artefacts removal. In this paper, we investigate into three different thin artefacts removal methods and compare their results using two different skin lesion segmentation methods. The segmentation results are compared with ground truth segmentation. In addition, we introduce our novel artefacts removal method, which combined with the Expectation Maximization image segmentation outperforms all the tested methods.","PeriodicalId":136980,"journal":{"name":"2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopic images by thin artefacts removal methods\",\"authors\":\"Tomás Majtner, Kristína Lidayová, Sule YAYILGAN YILDIRIM, J. Hardeberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EUVIP.2016.7764580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In dermoscopic images, various thin artefacts naturally appear, most usually in the form of hairs. While trying to find the border of the skin lesion, these artefacts effect the lesion segmentation methods and also the subsequent classification. Currently, there is a lot of research focus in this area and various methods are presented both for skin lesion segmentation and thin artefacts removal. In this paper, we investigate into three different thin artefacts removal methods and compare their results using two different skin lesion segmentation methods. The segmentation results are compared with ground truth segmentation. In addition, we introduce our novel artefacts removal method, which combined with the Expectation Maximization image segmentation outperforms all the tested methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUVIP.2016.7764580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 6th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EUVIP.2016.7764580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在皮肤镜图像中,各种薄的人工制品自然出现,通常以头发的形式出现。在试图找到皮肤病变的边界时,这些伪影影响了病变的分割方法,也影响了随后的分类。目前,这方面的研究有很多,无论是皮肤损伤分割还是薄伪物去除,都有各种各样的方法。在本文中,我们研究了三种不同的薄伪影去除方法,并比较了两种不同的皮肤损伤分割方法的结果。将分割结果与地面真值分割结果进行比较。此外,我们还提出了一种新的伪影去除方法,该方法与期望最大化图像分割相结合,优于所有测试过的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopic images by thin artefacts removal methods
In dermoscopic images, various thin artefacts naturally appear, most usually in the form of hairs. While trying to find the border of the skin lesion, these artefacts effect the lesion segmentation methods and also the subsequent classification. Currently, there is a lot of research focus in this area and various methods are presented both for skin lesion segmentation and thin artefacts removal. In this paper, we investigate into three different thin artefacts removal methods and compare their results using two different skin lesion segmentation methods. The segmentation results are compared with ground truth segmentation. In addition, we introduce our novel artefacts removal method, which combined with the Expectation Maximization image segmentation outperforms all the tested methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信