主动学习空气质量站选址建议

S. Deepak Narayanan, Apoorv Agnihotri, Nipun Batra
{"title":"主动学习空气质量站选址建议","authors":"S. Deepak Narayanan, Apoorv Agnihotri, Nipun Batra","doi":"10.1145/3371158.3371208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivation: Recent years have seen a decline in air quality across the planet, with studies suggesting that a significant proportion of global population has reduced life expectancy by up to 4 years [1, 2, 5]. To tackle this increasing growth in air pollution and its adverse effects, governments across the world have set up air quality monitoring stations that measure concentrations of various pollutants like NO2, SO2 and PM2.5, of which PM2.5 especially has significant health impact and is used for measuring air quality. One major issue with the deployment of these stations is the massive cost involved. Owing to the high installation and maintenance costs, the spatial resolution of air quality monitoring is generally poor. In this current work, we propose active learning methods to choose the next location to install an air quality monitor, motivated by sparse spatial air quality monitoring and expensive sensing equipment. Related Work: Previous work has predominantly focused on interpolation and forecasting of air quality [7, 8]. Work on air quality station location recommendation has largely been limited [4]. Previous work [4, 7, 8] has shown that installing air quality stations uniformly to maximize spatial coverage does not work well in practice, which acts as a major motivation for our work. Problem Statement: Given a set S of air quality monitoring stations, along with their corresponding values of PM2.5 over a period of time {d1,d2, ....dn }, where di represents day i , we want to choose a new location s ′, such that installing a station at s ′ gives us the best estimate of air quality at unknown locations. Approach: We perform active learning using Query by Committee (QBC) [6].Wemaintain three sets of stations the train set, the test set, and the pool set. The train set contains currently monitored locations, test set contains the locations where we wish to estimate the air quality and the pool set contains candidate stations for querying, i.e., we query from the pool set and observe how our estimation improves on the test set. To query from the pool set, we need a measure of uncertainty for the stations in the pool set. To obtain this uncertainty, we train an ensemble of learners, and take the standard deviation of their predictions for each station in the pool set. We add the station with maximum standard deviation to our train set, and remove the same station from the pool set. We repeat this process as time progresses. We use K Neighbors Regressor (KNN) as our main model inspired by the fact that nearby days will likely have similar air quality (temporal locality), and so will nearby stations (spatial","PeriodicalId":360747,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active Learning for Air Quality Station Location Recommendation\",\"authors\":\"S. Deepak Narayanan, Apoorv Agnihotri, Nipun Batra\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3371158.3371208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivation: Recent years have seen a decline in air quality across the planet, with studies suggesting that a significant proportion of global population has reduced life expectancy by up to 4 years [1, 2, 5]. To tackle this increasing growth in air pollution and its adverse effects, governments across the world have set up air quality monitoring stations that measure concentrations of various pollutants like NO2, SO2 and PM2.5, of which PM2.5 especially has significant health impact and is used for measuring air quality. One major issue with the deployment of these stations is the massive cost involved. Owing to the high installation and maintenance costs, the spatial resolution of air quality monitoring is generally poor. In this current work, we propose active learning methods to choose the next location to install an air quality monitor, motivated by sparse spatial air quality monitoring and expensive sensing equipment. Related Work: Previous work has predominantly focused on interpolation and forecasting of air quality [7, 8]. Work on air quality station location recommendation has largely been limited [4]. Previous work [4, 7, 8] has shown that installing air quality stations uniformly to maximize spatial coverage does not work well in practice, which acts as a major motivation for our work. Problem Statement: Given a set S of air quality monitoring stations, along with their corresponding values of PM2.5 over a period of time {d1,d2, ....dn }, where di represents day i , we want to choose a new location s ′, such that installing a station at s ′ gives us the best estimate of air quality at unknown locations. Approach: We perform active learning using Query by Committee (QBC) [6].Wemaintain three sets of stations the train set, the test set, and the pool set. The train set contains currently monitored locations, test set contains the locations where we wish to estimate the air quality and the pool set contains candidate stations for querying, i.e., we query from the pool set and observe how our estimation improves on the test set. To query from the pool set, we need a measure of uncertainty for the stations in the pool set. To obtain this uncertainty, we train an ensemble of learners, and take the standard deviation of their predictions for each station in the pool set. We add the station with maximum standard deviation to our train set, and remove the same station from the pool set. We repeat this process as time progresses. We use K Neighbors Regressor (KNN) as our main model inspired by the fact that nearby days will likely have similar air quality (temporal locality), and so will nearby stations (spatial\",\"PeriodicalId\":360747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3371158.3371208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3371158.3371208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

动机:近年来,全球空气质量下降,研究表明,全球很大一部分人口的预期寿命减少了4年[1,2,5]。为了应对日益增长的空气污染及其不利影响,世界各国政府都建立了空气质量监测站,测量各种污染物的浓度,如NO2, SO2和PM2.5,其中PM2.5对健康有重大影响,并用于测量空气质量。部署这些站点的一个主要问题是所涉及的巨大成本。由于安装和维护成本高,空气质量监测的空间分辨率普遍较差。在当前的工作中,我们提出主动学习方法来选择下一个安装空气质量监测仪的位置,这是由稀疏的空间空气质量监测和昂贵的传感设备驱动的。相关工作:以往的工作主要集中在空气质量的插值和预测[7,8]。关于空气质量监测站选址的推荐工作在很大程度上是有限的。先前的工作[4,7,8]表明,统一安装空气质量站以最大化空间覆盖在实践中效果并不好,这是我们工作的主要动力。问题表述:给定一组S个空气质量监测站,以及它们在一段时间内对应的PM2.5值{d1,d2, ....Dn},其中di表示第1天,我们想要选择一个新的位置s ',这样在s '安装一个监测站就能得到未知位置空气质量的最佳估计。方法:我们使用Query by Committee (QBC)[6]进行主动学习。我们维护三组站点:火车集、测试集和池集。列车集包含当前监控的位置,测试集包含我们希望估计空气质量的位置,池集包含用于查询的候选站点,也就是说,我们从池集查询并观察我们的估计在测试集上的改进情况。要从池集中查询,我们需要对池集中的站点进行不确定性度量。为了获得这种不确定性,我们训练了一组学习器,并对池集中的每个站点取其预测的标准差。我们将标准偏差最大的车站添加到我们的火车集,并从池集中删除相同的车站。随着时间的推移,我们重复这个过程。我们使用K近邻回归器(KNN)作为我们的主要模型,灵感来自这样一个事实,即附近的日子可能具有相似的空气质量(时间局域性),附近的站点也可能具有相似的空气质量(空间局域性)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Active Learning for Air Quality Station Location Recommendation
Motivation: Recent years have seen a decline in air quality across the planet, with studies suggesting that a significant proportion of global population has reduced life expectancy by up to 4 years [1, 2, 5]. To tackle this increasing growth in air pollution and its adverse effects, governments across the world have set up air quality monitoring stations that measure concentrations of various pollutants like NO2, SO2 and PM2.5, of which PM2.5 especially has significant health impact and is used for measuring air quality. One major issue with the deployment of these stations is the massive cost involved. Owing to the high installation and maintenance costs, the spatial resolution of air quality monitoring is generally poor. In this current work, we propose active learning methods to choose the next location to install an air quality monitor, motivated by sparse spatial air quality monitoring and expensive sensing equipment. Related Work: Previous work has predominantly focused on interpolation and forecasting of air quality [7, 8]. Work on air quality station location recommendation has largely been limited [4]. Previous work [4, 7, 8] has shown that installing air quality stations uniformly to maximize spatial coverage does not work well in practice, which acts as a major motivation for our work. Problem Statement: Given a set S of air quality monitoring stations, along with their corresponding values of PM2.5 over a period of time {d1,d2, ....dn }, where di represents day i , we want to choose a new location s ′, such that installing a station at s ′ gives us the best estimate of air quality at unknown locations. Approach: We perform active learning using Query by Committee (QBC) [6].Wemaintain three sets of stations the train set, the test set, and the pool set. The train set contains currently monitored locations, test set contains the locations where we wish to estimate the air quality and the pool set contains candidate stations for querying, i.e., we query from the pool set and observe how our estimation improves on the test set. To query from the pool set, we need a measure of uncertainty for the stations in the pool set. To obtain this uncertainty, we train an ensemble of learners, and take the standard deviation of their predictions for each station in the pool set. We add the station with maximum standard deviation to our train set, and remove the same station from the pool set. We repeat this process as time progresses. We use K Neighbors Regressor (KNN) as our main model inspired by the fact that nearby days will likely have similar air quality (temporal locality), and so will nearby stations (spatial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信