粒子滤波器的重采样算法研究

Jeroen D. Hol, Thomas B. Schon, F. Gustafsson
{"title":"粒子滤波器的重采样算法研究","authors":"Jeroen D. Hol, Thomas B. Schon, F. Gustafsson","doi":"10.1109/NSSPW.2006.4378824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a comparison is made between four frequently encountered resampling algorithms for particle filters. A theoretical framework is introduced to be able to understand and explain the differences between the resampling algorithms. This facilitates a comparison of the algorithms with respect to their resampling quality and computational complexity. Using extensive Monte Carlo simulations the theoretical results are verified. It is found that systematic resampling is favourable, both in terms of resampling quality and computational complexity.","PeriodicalId":388611,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE Nonlinear Statistical Signal Processing Workshop","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Resampling Algorithms for Particle Filters\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen D. Hol, Thomas B. Schon, F. Gustafsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSPW.2006.4378824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper a comparison is made between four frequently encountered resampling algorithms for particle filters. A theoretical framework is introduced to be able to understand and explain the differences between the resampling algorithms. This facilitates a comparison of the algorithms with respect to their resampling quality and computational complexity. Using extensive Monte Carlo simulations the theoretical results are verified. It is found that systematic resampling is favourable, both in terms of resampling quality and computational complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE Nonlinear Statistical Signal Processing Workshop\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE Nonlinear Statistical Signal Processing Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSPW.2006.4378824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE Nonlinear Statistical Signal Processing Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSPW.2006.4378824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

本文对四种常见的粒子滤波重采样算法进行了比较。为了能够理解和解释重采样算法之间的差异,引入了一个理论框架。这有助于对算法的重采样质量和计算复杂度进行比较。通过广泛的蒙特卡罗模拟验证了理论结果。发现系统重采样在重采样质量和计算复杂度方面都是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Resampling Algorithms for Particle Filters
In this paper a comparison is made between four frequently encountered resampling algorithms for particle filters. A theoretical framework is introduced to be able to understand and explain the differences between the resampling algorithms. This facilitates a comparison of the algorithms with respect to their resampling quality and computational complexity. Using extensive Monte Carlo simulations the theoretical results are verified. It is found that systematic resampling is favourable, both in terms of resampling quality and computational complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信