对二元联邦理论的再思考:欧盟和东盟在邦联-联邦二分法中的地位探索

Fran Marko Stojković
{"title":"对二元联邦理论的再思考:欧盟和东盟在邦联-联邦二分法中的地位探索","authors":"Fran Marko Stojković","doi":"10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the traditional binary federal theory, which distinguishes between concepts of confederation and federation, is not adequate for explaining the legal nature of various unions of states. In reaching such a conclusion, the paper first defines the traditional federal theory. It presents how both the concepts of a federation and a confederation, with all their associated characteristics, derive from the old absolute understanding of sovereignty. The unitary constitutional theory, which is the only constitutional theory compatible with this notion of federalism, is also explained. Afterwards, the legal structures of two very different integrational projects, the EU and ASEAN, are examined in the light of the traditional federal theory with the aim of concluding whether these entities are confederations or federations. It is suggested how and why ASEAN easily fits into the confederal category, while the EU defies both the federal and confederal box. From the results of such an analysis, a conclusion is drawn on why the theory is inadequate to explain the legal nature of certain unions, such as the EU. It is claimed that the theory, which is based on the idea of absolute sovereignty, has failed to readapt itself to the existence of unions of states in which absolute sovereignty is wholly absent. The paper concludes with a brief discussion on how the theory should be reformed to better fit the legal reality. It is suggested that a more spectral view on federalism is needed, either some brand-new one or the one conceptualised by James Madison back in the 18th century. \nKeywords: sovereignty, confederation, federation, federal theory, European Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations. \n  \n \nThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. \n  \nSuggested citation: FM Stojkovic, ‘Rethinking the Binary Federal Theory: A Search for the EU’s and ASEAN’s Place in the Confederal-Federal Dichotomy’ (2020) 16 CYELP 61.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the Binary Federal Theory: A Search for the EU’s and ASEAN’s Place in the Confederal-Federal Dichotomy\",\"authors\":\"Fran Marko Stojković\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that the traditional binary federal theory, which distinguishes between concepts of confederation and federation, is not adequate for explaining the legal nature of various unions of states. In reaching such a conclusion, the paper first defines the traditional federal theory. It presents how both the concepts of a federation and a confederation, with all their associated characteristics, derive from the old absolute understanding of sovereignty. The unitary constitutional theory, which is the only constitutional theory compatible with this notion of federalism, is also explained. Afterwards, the legal structures of two very different integrational projects, the EU and ASEAN, are examined in the light of the traditional federal theory with the aim of concluding whether these entities are confederations or federations. It is suggested how and why ASEAN easily fits into the confederal category, while the EU defies both the federal and confederal box. From the results of such an analysis, a conclusion is drawn on why the theory is inadequate to explain the legal nature of certain unions, such as the EU. It is claimed that the theory, which is based on the idea of absolute sovereignty, has failed to readapt itself to the existence of unions of states in which absolute sovereignty is wholly absent. The paper concludes with a brief discussion on how the theory should be reformed to better fit the legal reality. It is suggested that a more spectral view on federalism is needed, either some brand-new one or the one conceptualised by James Madison back in the 18th century. \\nKeywords: sovereignty, confederation, federation, federal theory, European Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations. \\n  \\n \\nThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. \\n  \\nSuggested citation: FM Stojkovic, ‘Rethinking the Binary Federal Theory: A Search for the EU’s and ASEAN’s Place in the Confederal-Federal Dichotomy’ (2020) 16 CYELP 61.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.16.2020.378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,传统的二元联邦理论区分了邦联和联邦的概念,不足以解释各种国家联盟的法律性质。为了得出这样的结论,本文首先对传统联邦理论进行了界定。它展示了联邦和邦联的概念及其所有相关特征是如何从对主权的旧的绝对理解中衍生出来的。统一宪制理论是唯一与联邦制相容的宪制理论。然后,根据传统的联邦理论,对欧盟和东盟这两个非常不同的一体化项目的法律结构进行了审查,目的是得出这些实体是联邦还是联邦的结论。本文提出了东盟如何以及为什么容易被归入联邦范畴,而欧盟既不属于联邦范畴,也不属于联邦范畴。从这种分析的结果中,可以得出一个结论,为什么这个理论不足以解释某些工会的法律性质,比如欧盟。有人认为,以绝对主权为基础的理论,未能适应完全没有绝对主权的国家联盟的存在。最后,本文简要讨论了该理论应如何进行改革,以更好地适应法律现实。有人建议,需要对联邦制有一个更模糊的看法,要么是一些全新的观点,要么是詹姆斯·麦迪逊(James Madison)在18世纪提出的概念。关键词:主权,邦联,联邦,联邦理论,欧盟,东南亚国家联盟本作品在知识共享署名-非商业-无衍生品4.0国际许可下获得许可。建议引用:FM Stojkovic,“重新思考二元联邦理论:寻找欧盟和东盟在联邦-联邦二分法中的位置”(2020)16 CYELP 61。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking the Binary Federal Theory: A Search for the EU’s and ASEAN’s Place in the Confederal-Federal Dichotomy
This paper argues that the traditional binary federal theory, which distinguishes between concepts of confederation and federation, is not adequate for explaining the legal nature of various unions of states. In reaching such a conclusion, the paper first defines the traditional federal theory. It presents how both the concepts of a federation and a confederation, with all their associated characteristics, derive from the old absolute understanding of sovereignty. The unitary constitutional theory, which is the only constitutional theory compatible with this notion of federalism, is also explained. Afterwards, the legal structures of two very different integrational projects, the EU and ASEAN, are examined in the light of the traditional federal theory with the aim of concluding whether these entities are confederations or federations. It is suggested how and why ASEAN easily fits into the confederal category, while the EU defies both the federal and confederal box. From the results of such an analysis, a conclusion is drawn on why the theory is inadequate to explain the legal nature of certain unions, such as the EU. It is claimed that the theory, which is based on the idea of absolute sovereignty, has failed to readapt itself to the existence of unions of states in which absolute sovereignty is wholly absent. The paper concludes with a brief discussion on how the theory should be reformed to better fit the legal reality. It is suggested that a more spectral view on federalism is needed, either some brand-new one or the one conceptualised by James Madison back in the 18th century. Keywords: sovereignty, confederation, federation, federal theory, European Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations.   This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License.   Suggested citation: FM Stojkovic, ‘Rethinking the Binary Federal Theory: A Search for the EU’s and ASEAN’s Place in the Confederal-Federal Dichotomy’ (2020) 16 CYELP 61.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信