助听器使用者满意度预测。

S E Gerber, L B Fisher
{"title":"助听器使用者满意度预测。","authors":"S E Gerber,&nbsp;L B Fisher","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study raised the question of whether certain methods of hearing aid evaluation could predict subjects' satisfaction and willingness to use their aids. For this purpose, we compared two hearing aid evaluation methods on 30 subjects between the ages of 55 and 65 years, all of whom were hearing aid users for some months. Five signal-to-noise ratios were used. The results of this experiment indicated a significant and positive correlation between subject satisfaction and subject willingness to use the hearing aid. Results of multiple regression analyses indicated that both evaluation methods were better predictors of usage than of satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":76027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Auditory Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of hearing aid users' satisfaction.\",\"authors\":\"S E Gerber,&nbsp;L B Fisher\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study raised the question of whether certain methods of hearing aid evaluation could predict subjects' satisfaction and willingness to use their aids. For this purpose, we compared two hearing aid evaluation methods on 30 subjects between the ages of 55 and 65 years, all of whom were hearing aid users for some months. Five signal-to-noise ratios were used. The results of this experiment indicated a significant and positive correlation between subject satisfaction and subject willingness to use the hearing aid. Results of multiple regression analyses indicated that both evaluation methods were better predictors of usage than of satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Auditory Society\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"35-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Auditory Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Auditory Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一个问题,即某些助听器评估方法是否可以预测受试者对助听器的满意度和使用意愿。为此,我们对30名年龄在55岁至65岁之间的受试者进行了两种助听器评估方法的比较,这些受试者都使用了助听器几个月。采用了5种信噪比。实验结果表明,被试满意度与被试使用助听器的意愿呈显著正相关。多元回归分析结果显示,两种评价方法均能较好地预测使用率而非满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of hearing aid users' satisfaction.

This study raised the question of whether certain methods of hearing aid evaluation could predict subjects' satisfaction and willingness to use their aids. For this purpose, we compared two hearing aid evaluation methods on 30 subjects between the ages of 55 and 65 years, all of whom were hearing aid users for some months. Five signal-to-noise ratios were used. The results of this experiment indicated a significant and positive correlation between subject satisfaction and subject willingness to use the hearing aid. Results of multiple regression analyses indicated that both evaluation methods were better predictors of usage than of satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信