真假转变:南非大学真正非殖民化障碍的讨论

D. Zwane
{"title":"真假转变:南非大学真正非殖民化障碍的讨论","authors":"D. Zwane","doi":"10.1080/18186874.2019.1625713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract South African tertiary institutions have supposedly been in a transitional state for decades. The country's universities profess the merits of the transformation occurring within their walls. Despite this purported embrace of decolonised scholarship, the reality is that there is great ambivalence towards it. The highly publicised reports of tensions and inequalities shatter the illusion of this intellectual utopia. Consequently, this article interrogates the major issues that are impeding this supposedly seamless transition to a decolonised higher education system. It presents the criticisms that are regularly raised by decolonisation advocates. Significantly, a notorious public dispute between two respected scholars is utilised as a case study. The incident illustrates institutional hypocrisy and validates the criticism levelled against South African universities. Essentially, the article's overarching objective is to highlight the discrepancy between the idyllic fantasy of a decolonised university and the reality being experienced by South African scholars.","PeriodicalId":256939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"True versus False Transformation: A Discussion of the Obstacles to Authentic Decolonisation at South African Universities\",\"authors\":\"D. Zwane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18186874.2019.1625713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract South African tertiary institutions have supposedly been in a transitional state for decades. The country's universities profess the merits of the transformation occurring within their walls. Despite this purported embrace of decolonised scholarship, the reality is that there is great ambivalence towards it. The highly publicised reports of tensions and inequalities shatter the illusion of this intellectual utopia. Consequently, this article interrogates the major issues that are impeding this supposedly seamless transition to a decolonised higher education system. It presents the criticisms that are regularly raised by decolonisation advocates. Significantly, a notorious public dispute between two respected scholars is utilised as a case study. The incident illustrates institutional hypocrisy and validates the criticism levelled against South African universities. Essentially, the article's overarching objective is to highlight the discrepancy between the idyllic fantasy of a decolonised university and the reality being experienced by South African scholars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2019.1625713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2019.1625713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

据推测,南非高等教育机构几十年来一直处于过渡状态。这个国家的大学都承认校内发生的变革带来的好处。尽管这种所谓的对非殖民化学术的拥抱,但现实是,人们对它有很大的矛盾心理。对紧张和不平等的高度公开报道粉碎了这种知识乌托邦的幻想。因此,本文探讨了阻碍这种所谓无缝过渡到非殖民化高等教育体系的主要问题。它提出了非殖民化倡导者经常提出的批评。值得注意的是,两位受人尊敬的学者之间臭名昭著的公开争论被用作案例研究。这一事件表明了机构的虚伪,并证实了对南非大学的批评。从本质上讲,这篇文章的首要目标是强调非殖民化大学的田园诗般的幻想与南非学者所经历的现实之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
True versus False Transformation: A Discussion of the Obstacles to Authentic Decolonisation at South African Universities
Abstract South African tertiary institutions have supposedly been in a transitional state for decades. The country's universities profess the merits of the transformation occurring within their walls. Despite this purported embrace of decolonised scholarship, the reality is that there is great ambivalence towards it. The highly publicised reports of tensions and inequalities shatter the illusion of this intellectual utopia. Consequently, this article interrogates the major issues that are impeding this supposedly seamless transition to a decolonised higher education system. It presents the criticisms that are regularly raised by decolonisation advocates. Significantly, a notorious public dispute between two respected scholars is utilised as a case study. The incident illustrates institutional hypocrisy and validates the criticism levelled against South African universities. Essentially, the article's overarching objective is to highlight the discrepancy between the idyllic fantasy of a decolonised university and the reality being experienced by South African scholars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信