伊斯兰教法经济纠纷裁决在宗教法院的映射

R. Ridwan, Muhammad Fuad Zain, Bani Syarif Maula
{"title":"伊斯兰教法经济纠纷裁决在宗教法院的映射","authors":"R. Ridwan, Muhammad Fuad Zain, Bani Syarif Maula","doi":"10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This article analyzes Law No. 3 of 2006, which has extended competence to the Religious Courts in the resolution of Sharia economic disputes. The research data came from the results of the judge’s interview on the court’s decision regarding the validity and competence of the judge. The author finds that in judicial legal considerations in case No. 2074/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Pwt gave rise to the theory that the restructuring of murabaha contracts should not be carried out on debtors who are unable to pay installments by the agreement and auction off collateral items that are correct and not deeds against the law. While case No. 2449/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Pwt in the musharaka contract reject the potential loss by referring to Fatwa DSN No. 43/DSN-MUI/VIII/2014, which states that the amount of compensation in the participation contract is the value of the real loss that must be experienced in a transaction. Legal discovery using the material and formal legal basis with the method of interpretation of the legislation and restrictive method by limiting or narrowing the interpretation of the legislation in the framework of prudence so as not to make a mistake in making a decision.","PeriodicalId":415970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mapping of Sharia Economic Dispute Decisions in Religious Courts\",\"authors\":\"R. Ridwan, Muhammad Fuad Zain, Bani Syarif Maula\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This article analyzes Law No. 3 of 2006, which has extended competence to the Religious Courts in the resolution of Sharia economic disputes. The research data came from the results of the judge’s interview on the court’s decision regarding the validity and competence of the judge. The author finds that in judicial legal considerations in case No. 2074/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Pwt gave rise to the theory that the restructuring of murabaha contracts should not be carried out on debtors who are unable to pay installments by the agreement and auction off collateral items that are correct and not deeds against the law. While case No. 2449/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Pwt in the musharaka contract reject the potential loss by referring to Fatwa DSN No. 43/DSN-MUI/VIII/2014, which states that the amount of compensation in the participation contract is the value of the real loss that must be experienced in a transaction. Legal discovery using the material and formal legal basis with the method of interpretation of the legislation and restrictive method by limiting or narrowing the interpretation of the legislation in the framework of prudence so as not to make a mistake in making a decision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-11-2020.2311813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

. 本文分析了2006年第3号法,该法将解决伊斯兰教法经济纠纷的权限扩大到宗教法院。研究数据来源于法官对法院关于法官有效性和胜任力的判决的访谈结果。笔者认为,在第2074/Pdt.G/2017/PA号案件的司法法律考虑中。Pwt提出了一种理论,即murabaha合同的重组不应对无法按协议支付分期付款的债务人进行,并拍卖正确而不是违反法律的抵押项目。第2449/Pdt.G/2018/PA号案件。根据法特瓦DSN第43/DSN- mui /VIII/2014号规定,参与合约中的补偿金额为交易中必须经历的实际损失的价值,穆沙拉夫合约中的Pwt拒绝接受潜在损失。法律发现采用物质和形式的法律依据与立法解释的方法和限制性的方法,在审慎的框架内通过限制或缩小立法解释的范围,以免在作出决定时犯错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Mapping of Sharia Economic Dispute Decisions in Religious Courts
. This article analyzes Law No. 3 of 2006, which has extended competence to the Religious Courts in the resolution of Sharia economic disputes. The research data came from the results of the judge’s interview on the court’s decision regarding the validity and competence of the judge. The author finds that in judicial legal considerations in case No. 2074/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Pwt gave rise to the theory that the restructuring of murabaha contracts should not be carried out on debtors who are unable to pay installments by the agreement and auction off collateral items that are correct and not deeds against the law. While case No. 2449/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Pwt in the musharaka contract reject the potential loss by referring to Fatwa DSN No. 43/DSN-MUI/VIII/2014, which states that the amount of compensation in the participation contract is the value of the real loss that must be experienced in a transaction. Legal discovery using the material and formal legal basis with the method of interpretation of the legislation and restrictive method by limiting or narrowing the interpretation of the legislation in the framework of prudence so as not to make a mistake in making a decision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信