组合服务恢复机制一致性的正式验证

Walid Gaaloul, Sami Bhiri, M. Hauswirth, M. Rouached, C. Godart
{"title":"组合服务恢复机制一致性的正式验证","authors":"Walid Gaaloul, Sami Bhiri, M. Hauswirth, M. Rouached, C. Godart","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the inherent autonomy and heterogeneity of Web services, ensuring composite services reliability remains a challenging problem. Extending the classical control flow with a transactional flow (encapsulating a set of recovery mechanisms) is widely accepted for ensuring composite services reliability. However, current approaches define recovery mechanisms in and ad-hoc way while they have to respect consistency rules regarding the control flow. In this paper, we propose a formal model based on event calculus for capturing both control and transactional flow of composite services. Following a pattern based modelling approach, we depict a set of rules characterising consistent transactional flow that can be defined w.r.t a given control flow. In addition, we propose two complementary approaches for enhancing composite services reliability.","PeriodicalId":340691,"journal":{"name":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal verification of composite service recovery mechanisms consistency\",\"authors\":\"Walid Gaaloul, Sami Bhiri, M. Hauswirth, M. Rouached, C. Godart\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the inherent autonomy and heterogeneity of Web services, ensuring composite services reliability remains a challenging problem. Extending the classical control flow with a transactional flow (encapsulating a set of recovery mechanisms) is widely accepted for ensuring composite services reliability. However, current approaches define recovery mechanisms in and ad-hoc way while they have to respect consistency rules regarding the control flow. In this paper, we propose a formal model based on event calculus for capturing both control and transactional flow of composite services. Following a pattern based modelling approach, we depict a set of rules characterising consistent transactional flow that can be defined w.r.t a given control flow. In addition, we propose two complementary approaches for enhancing composite services reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

由于Web服务固有的自治和异构性,确保组合服务的可靠性仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。为了确保组合服务的可靠性,使用事务流(封装一组恢复机制)扩展经典控制流被广泛接受。然而,当前的方法以一种特别的方式定义恢复机制,同时必须遵守有关控制流的一致性规则。本文提出了一种基于事件演算的形式化模型,用于捕获组合服务的控制流和事务流。遵循基于模式的建模方法,我们描述了一组描述一致事务流特征的规则,这些规则可以在给定控制流的基础上定义。此外,我们提出了两种互补的方法来增强组合服务的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal verification of composite service recovery mechanisms consistency
Due to the inherent autonomy and heterogeneity of Web services, ensuring composite services reliability remains a challenging problem. Extending the classical control flow with a transactional flow (encapsulating a set of recovery mechanisms) is widely accepted for ensuring composite services reliability. However, current approaches define recovery mechanisms in and ad-hoc way while they have to respect consistency rules regarding the control flow. In this paper, we propose a formal model based on event calculus for capturing both control and transactional flow of composite services. Following a pattern based modelling approach, we depict a set of rules characterising consistent transactional flow that can be defined w.r.t a given control flow. In addition, we propose two complementary approaches for enhancing composite services reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信