Walid Gaaloul, Sami Bhiri, M. Hauswirth, M. Rouached, C. Godart
{"title":"组合服务恢复机制一致性的正式验证","authors":"Walid Gaaloul, Sami Bhiri, M. Hauswirth, M. Rouached, C. Godart","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the inherent autonomy and heterogeneity of Web services, ensuring composite services reliability remains a challenging problem. Extending the classical control flow with a transactional flow (encapsulating a set of recovery mechanisms) is widely accepted for ensuring composite services reliability. However, current approaches define recovery mechanisms in and ad-hoc way while they have to respect consistency rules regarding the control flow. In this paper, we propose a formal model based on event calculus for capturing both control and transactional flow of composite services. Following a pattern based modelling approach, we depict a set of rules characterising consistent transactional flow that can be defined w.r.t a given control flow. In addition, we propose two complementary approaches for enhancing composite services reliability.","PeriodicalId":340691,"journal":{"name":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal verification of composite service recovery mechanisms consistency\",\"authors\":\"Walid Gaaloul, Sami Bhiri, M. Hauswirth, M. Rouached, C. Godart\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the inherent autonomy and heterogeneity of Web services, ensuring composite services reliability remains a challenging problem. Extending the classical control flow with a transactional flow (encapsulating a set of recovery mechanisms) is widely accepted for ensuring composite services reliability. However, current approaches define recovery mechanisms in and ad-hoc way while they have to respect consistency rules regarding the control flow. In this paper, we propose a formal model based on event calculus for capturing both control and transactional flow of composite services. Following a pattern based modelling approach, we depict a set of rules characterising consistent transactional flow that can be defined w.r.t a given control flow. In addition, we propose two complementary approaches for enhancing composite services reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Formal verification of composite service recovery mechanisms consistency
Due to the inherent autonomy and heterogeneity of Web services, ensuring composite services reliability remains a challenging problem. Extending the classical control flow with a transactional flow (encapsulating a set of recovery mechanisms) is widely accepted for ensuring composite services reliability. However, current approaches define recovery mechanisms in and ad-hoc way while they have to respect consistency rules regarding the control flow. In this paper, we propose a formal model based on event calculus for capturing both control and transactional flow of composite services. Following a pattern based modelling approach, we depict a set of rules characterising consistent transactional flow that can be defined w.r.t a given control flow. In addition, we propose two complementary approaches for enhancing composite services reliability.