PDGraph:安全漏洞项目依赖性的大规模实证研究

Qiang Li, Jinke Song, Dawei Tan, Haining Wang, Jiqiang Liu
{"title":"PDGraph:安全漏洞项目依赖性的大规模实证研究","authors":"Qiang Li, Jinke Song, Dawei Tan, Haining Wang, Jiqiang Liu","doi":"10.1109/DSN48987.2021.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reuse of libraries in software development has become prevalent for improving development efficiency and software quality. However, security vulnerabilities of reused libraries propagated through software project dependency pose a severe security threat, but they have not yet been well studied. In this paper, we present the first large-scale empirical study of project dependencies with respect to security vulnerabilities. We developed PDGraph, an innovative approach for analyzing publicly known security vulnerabilities among numerous project dependencies, which provides a new perspective for assessing security risks in the wild. As a large-scale software collection in dependency, we find 337,415 projects and 1,385,338 dependency relations. In particular, PDGraph generates a project dependency graph, where each node is a project, and each edge indicates a dependency relationship. We conducted experiments to validate the efficacy of PDGraph and characterized its features for security analysis. We revealed that 1,014 projects have publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, and more than 67,806 projects are directly dependent on them. Among these, 42,441 projects still manifest 67,581 insecure dependency relationships, indicating that they are built on vulnerable versions of reused libraries even though their vulnerabilities are publicly known. During our eight-month observation period, only 1,266 insecure edges were fixed, and corresponding vulnerable libraries were updated to secure versions. Furthermore, we uncovered four underlying dependency risks that can significantly reduce the difficulty of compromising systems. We conducted a quantitative analysis of dependency risks on the PDGraph.","PeriodicalId":222512,"journal":{"name":"2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PDGraph: A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Project Dependency of Security Vulnerabilities\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Li, Jinke Song, Dawei Tan, Haining Wang, Jiqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSN48987.2021.00031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reuse of libraries in software development has become prevalent for improving development efficiency and software quality. However, security vulnerabilities of reused libraries propagated through software project dependency pose a severe security threat, but they have not yet been well studied. In this paper, we present the first large-scale empirical study of project dependencies with respect to security vulnerabilities. We developed PDGraph, an innovative approach for analyzing publicly known security vulnerabilities among numerous project dependencies, which provides a new perspective for assessing security risks in the wild. As a large-scale software collection in dependency, we find 337,415 projects and 1,385,338 dependency relations. In particular, PDGraph generates a project dependency graph, where each node is a project, and each edge indicates a dependency relationship. We conducted experiments to validate the efficacy of PDGraph and characterized its features for security analysis. We revealed that 1,014 projects have publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, and more than 67,806 projects are directly dependent on them. Among these, 42,441 projects still manifest 67,581 insecure dependency relationships, indicating that they are built on vulnerable versions of reused libraries even though their vulnerabilities are publicly known. During our eight-month observation period, only 1,266 insecure edges were fixed, and corresponding vulnerable libraries were updated to secure versions. Furthermore, we uncovered four underlying dependency risks that can significantly reduce the difficulty of compromising systems. We conducted a quantitative analysis of dependency risks on the PDGraph.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN48987.2021.00031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN48987.2021.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在软件开发中,库的重用已成为提高开发效率和软件质量的重要手段。然而,通过软件项目依赖关系传播的重用库的安全漏洞构成了严重的安全威胁,但尚未得到很好的研究。在本文中,我们提出了与安全漏洞相关的项目依赖关系的第一个大规模实证研究。我们开发了PDGraph,这是一种创新的方法,用于分析众多项目依赖关系中公开已知的安全漏洞,它为评估野外安全风险提供了一种新的视角。作为一个依赖的大型软件集合,我们发现了337,415个项目和1,385,338个依赖关系。具体来说,PDGraph生成一个项目依赖图,其中每个节点都是一个项目,每个边表示一个依赖关系。我们进行了实验来验证PDGraph的有效性,并对其特征进行了表征以进行安全性分析。我们发现有1014个项目公开披露了漏洞,超过67806个项目直接依赖于这些漏洞。其中,42,441个项目仍然表现出67,581个不安全的依赖关系,这表明它们是建立在重用库的易受攻击版本上的,尽管它们的漏洞是公开的。在我们8个月的观察期间,仅修复了1266个不安全边缘,并将相应的脆弱库更新为安全版本。此外,我们发现了四种潜在的依赖风险,它们可以显著降低破坏系统的难度。我们在PDGraph上对依赖风险进行了定量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PDGraph: A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Project Dependency of Security Vulnerabilities
The reuse of libraries in software development has become prevalent for improving development efficiency and software quality. However, security vulnerabilities of reused libraries propagated through software project dependency pose a severe security threat, but they have not yet been well studied. In this paper, we present the first large-scale empirical study of project dependencies with respect to security vulnerabilities. We developed PDGraph, an innovative approach for analyzing publicly known security vulnerabilities among numerous project dependencies, which provides a new perspective for assessing security risks in the wild. As a large-scale software collection in dependency, we find 337,415 projects and 1,385,338 dependency relations. In particular, PDGraph generates a project dependency graph, where each node is a project, and each edge indicates a dependency relationship. We conducted experiments to validate the efficacy of PDGraph and characterized its features for security analysis. We revealed that 1,014 projects have publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, and more than 67,806 projects are directly dependent on them. Among these, 42,441 projects still manifest 67,581 insecure dependency relationships, indicating that they are built on vulnerable versions of reused libraries even though their vulnerabilities are publicly known. During our eight-month observation period, only 1,266 insecure edges were fixed, and corresponding vulnerable libraries were updated to secure versions. Furthermore, we uncovered four underlying dependency risks that can significantly reduce the difficulty of compromising systems. We conducted a quantitative analysis of dependency risks on the PDGraph.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信