主动脉根部手术中的重塑与再植——主动脉功能不全的比较结果和危险因素

R. Komarov, A. Ismailbaev, A. N. Dzyundzya, S. V. Chernyavskii, S. S. Badalyan, A. Danachev, O. O. Ognev
{"title":"主动脉根部手术中的重塑与再植——主动脉功能不全的比较结果和危险因素","authors":"R. Komarov, A. Ismailbaev, A. N. Dzyundzya, S. V. Chernyavskii, S. S. Badalyan, A. Danachev, O. O. Ognev","doi":"10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4s-182-193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights. The main approaches to the aortic root valve-sparing surgery of are reimplantation and remodeling;The literature review demonstrates either the relative identity of the reimplantation and remodeling clinical outcomes, or the advantage of reimplantation in relation to long-term results.Abstract. In recent decades, valve-sparring methods of aortic root replacement, including reimplantation and remodeling, as well as their modifications, have been developed and put into widespread practice. The effectiveness and durability of these two approaches is the subject of discussions in the modern cardiac surgery community. The global experience in performing remodeling and reimplantation procedures allows  for a comprehensive literature review to compare the results of these approaches.  The presented review is devoted to the comparison of surgical aspects and clinical outcomes of reimplantation and remodeling techniques, the analysis of the feasibility of restoring the physiological architectonics of the aortic root in valve-sparring operations using Valsalva grafts, as well as the assessment of risk factors for residual aortic insufficiency after such interventions. The search strategy included the analysis of international (PubMed, Scopus, Embase) databases for the following keywords: “reimplantation versus remodeling for aortic root valve-sparring procedures”, “David procedure versus Yacoub procedure”, “Valsalva graft for aortic root valve-sparring procedures”, “Valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis”. Literature analysis demonstrates either the relative identity of early and long-term results of reimplantation and remodeling procedures, or the advantage of reimplantation in terms of freedom from late mortality and residual aortic insufficiency. Preservation of the physiology of the aortic root by implantation of Valsalva grafts or remodeling provides better hemodynamics and reduces stress on the leaflets, however, these postulates run counter to the data of clinical studies analyzing postoperative outcomes and demonstrating the lack of advantages of Valsalva grafts over linear prostheses in terms of freedom from aortic valve surgery. Residual postoperative regurgitation of a mild degree, a decrease in the effective height below 9 mm and additional interventions on the leaflets are reliable factors of significant aortic insufficiency in the long-term period after valve-sparring operations on the aortic root.","PeriodicalId":227108,"journal":{"name":"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remodeling versus reimplantation in aortic root surgery – comparative results and risk factors for aortic insufficiency\",\"authors\":\"R. Komarov, A. Ismailbaev, A. N. Dzyundzya, S. V. Chernyavskii, S. S. Badalyan, A. Danachev, O. O. Ognev\",\"doi\":\"10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4s-182-193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Highlights. The main approaches to the aortic root valve-sparing surgery of are reimplantation and remodeling;The literature review demonstrates either the relative identity of the reimplantation and remodeling clinical outcomes, or the advantage of reimplantation in relation to long-term results.Abstract. In recent decades, valve-sparring methods of aortic root replacement, including reimplantation and remodeling, as well as their modifications, have been developed and put into widespread practice. The effectiveness and durability of these two approaches is the subject of discussions in the modern cardiac surgery community. The global experience in performing remodeling and reimplantation procedures allows  for a comprehensive literature review to compare the results of these approaches.  The presented review is devoted to the comparison of surgical aspects and clinical outcomes of reimplantation and remodeling techniques, the analysis of the feasibility of restoring the physiological architectonics of the aortic root in valve-sparring operations using Valsalva grafts, as well as the assessment of risk factors for residual aortic insufficiency after such interventions. The search strategy included the analysis of international (PubMed, Scopus, Embase) databases for the following keywords: “reimplantation versus remodeling for aortic root valve-sparring procedures”, “David procedure versus Yacoub procedure”, “Valsalva graft for aortic root valve-sparring procedures”, “Valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis”. Literature analysis demonstrates either the relative identity of early and long-term results of reimplantation and remodeling procedures, or the advantage of reimplantation in terms of freedom from late mortality and residual aortic insufficiency. Preservation of the physiology of the aortic root by implantation of Valsalva grafts or remodeling provides better hemodynamics and reduces stress on the leaflets, however, these postulates run counter to the data of clinical studies analyzing postoperative outcomes and demonstrating the lack of advantages of Valsalva grafts over linear prostheses in terms of freedom from aortic valve surgery. Residual postoperative regurgitation of a mild degree, a decrease in the effective height below 9 mm and additional interventions on the leaflets are reliable factors of significant aortic insufficiency in the long-term period after valve-sparring operations on the aortic root.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4s-182-193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4s-182-193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高光。主动脉根瓣保留手术的主要方法是再植和重塑;文献综述表明再植和重塑的临床结果的相对一致性,或者再植的长期效果的优势。近几十年来,主动脉根部置换术的瓣膜分离方法,包括再植和重塑,以及它们的修改,已经发展并得到广泛的应用。这两种方法的有效性和持久性是现代心脏外科界讨论的主题。在进行重塑和再植手术的全球经验允许一个全面的文献综述来比较这些方法的结果。本文综述了瓣膜置换术和重塑技术的外科方面和临床结果的比较,分析了在瓣膜置换术中使用Valsalva移植物恢复主动脉根部生理结构的可行性,并评估了此类干预后主动脉残余功能不全的危险因素。检索策略包括对国际(PubMed, Scopus, Embase)数据库的以下关键词进行分析:“主动脉根瓣分离手术的再植入术与重塑”,“David手术与Yacoub手术”,“Valsalva移植物用于主动脉根瓣分离手术”,“保留瓣膜的主动脉根修复与解剖形状的鼻窦假体”。文献分析表明,再植和重塑手术的早期和长期结果的相对一致性,或者再植在避免晚期死亡和残余主动脉功能不全方面的优势。通过植入Valsalva移植物或重塑来保留主动脉根部的生理功能,可以提供更好的血流动力学,减少对小叶的压力,然而,这些假设与临床研究的数据相反,分析了术后结果,并表明Valsalva移植物在主动脉瓣手术方面缺乏线性假体的优势。术后残余轻度反流、有效高度低于9 mm以及对瓣叶进行额外干预是主动脉根部瓣置换术后长期出现明显主动脉功能不全的可靠因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remodeling versus reimplantation in aortic root surgery – comparative results and risk factors for aortic insufficiency
Highlights. The main approaches to the aortic root valve-sparing surgery of are reimplantation and remodeling;The literature review demonstrates either the relative identity of the reimplantation and remodeling clinical outcomes, or the advantage of reimplantation in relation to long-term results.Abstract. In recent decades, valve-sparring methods of aortic root replacement, including reimplantation and remodeling, as well as their modifications, have been developed and put into widespread practice. The effectiveness and durability of these two approaches is the subject of discussions in the modern cardiac surgery community. The global experience in performing remodeling and reimplantation procedures allows  for a comprehensive literature review to compare the results of these approaches.  The presented review is devoted to the comparison of surgical aspects and clinical outcomes of reimplantation and remodeling techniques, the analysis of the feasibility of restoring the physiological architectonics of the aortic root in valve-sparring operations using Valsalva grafts, as well as the assessment of risk factors for residual aortic insufficiency after such interventions. The search strategy included the analysis of international (PubMed, Scopus, Embase) databases for the following keywords: “reimplantation versus remodeling for aortic root valve-sparring procedures”, “David procedure versus Yacoub procedure”, “Valsalva graft for aortic root valve-sparring procedures”, “Valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis”. Literature analysis demonstrates either the relative identity of early and long-term results of reimplantation and remodeling procedures, or the advantage of reimplantation in terms of freedom from late mortality and residual aortic insufficiency. Preservation of the physiology of the aortic root by implantation of Valsalva grafts or remodeling provides better hemodynamics and reduces stress on the leaflets, however, these postulates run counter to the data of clinical studies analyzing postoperative outcomes and demonstrating the lack of advantages of Valsalva grafts over linear prostheses in terms of freedom from aortic valve surgery. Residual postoperative regurgitation of a mild degree, a decrease in the effective height below 9 mm and additional interventions on the leaflets are reliable factors of significant aortic insufficiency in the long-term period after valve-sparring operations on the aortic root.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信